Rates of Consumer Stimulus/ Rates of Return on Investment. The nice thing about this is that we can gauge consumer stimulus as Mr. Lyon, a student in the Doctoral program at UCL points out, in pennies per minute. We can gauge consumer stimulus at pennies per minute. Gauge the Improvement on Investment. We can gauge the improvement in returns on investment also therefore and actually see the increased returns on investment across the economy; more food and vehicles sold for an extra 2 cents a minute paid to the consumer for example. This is easy to see more clearly once we provide the 8 cents a minute or 17 cents a minute to the consumer in total to see more car sales vs car rentals. But you will see more sales of everything. How do the returns on investment improve at 17 cents a minute vs the current rate of 6 cents a minute in Ontario vs the 8 cents a minute in Québec; and the 8 cents a minute in California? Sales go up. But to see sales go up, it would not be that the government takes it's authority to set food prices by subsidising prices with the manufacturers for a cheaper average price on the shelf at the supermarket. You would ensure they get the money necessary to do this. You would go into to the government computer system and send them the money. But you would also have to go into the government computer system and send every citizen the benefit money so they can pay for the food as subsidised. Subsidies or not, the food is not paid for yet and we have not earned anything unless people can pay. It might be best to not only pay at the current benefits rate but to also increase annually at the rate of standard inflation, if any, if the price goes up. Yet it may go down since the cost of manufacturing has gone down with automation. These companies do owe the government on loans made to them for the installation of automation processes for food manufacturing.

   Rates of Consumer Stimulus/ Rates of Return on Investment. 

The nice thing about this is that we can gauge consumer stimulus as Mr. Lyon, a student in the Doctoral program at UCL points out, in pennies per minute.   We can gauge consumer stimulus at pennies per minute. 

Gauge the Improvement on Investment.

We can gauge the improvement in returns on investment also therefore and actually see the increased returns on investment across the economy; more food and vehicles sold for an extra 2 cents a minute paid to the consumer for example. 

This is easy to see more clearly once we provide the 8 cents a minute or 17 cents a minute to the consumer in total to see more car sales vs car rentals. But you will see more sales of everything.  How do the returns on investment improve at 17 cents a minute vs the current rate of 6 cents a minute in Ontario vs the 8 cents a minute in Québec; and the 8 cents a minute in California? Sales go up. 

But to see sales go up, it would not be that the government takes it's authority to set food prices by subsidising prices with the manufacturers for a cheaper average price on the shelf at the supermarket. You would ensure they get the money necessary to do this. 

You would go into to the government computer system and send them the money. But you would also have to  go into the government computer system and send every citizen the benefit money so they can pay for the food as subsidised. Subsidies or not, the food is not paid for yet and we have not earned anything unless people can pay. 

It might be best to not only pay at the current benefits rate but to also increase annually at the rate of  standard inflation, if any, if the price goes up. Yet it may go down since the cost of manufacturing has gone down with automation. These companies do owe the government on loans made to them for the installation of automation processes for food manufacturing. 

The machine heralds the time of entering the great rest; so there is no work. When there is no work there is rest but also usually it means no money. Id there is no money there is less return on goods made; (in the investment). This is in so in the lower (cost of the investment) to make the goods with the machines. There is lower cost  in using the machines but less return on investment because the company is not hiring people; not paying people money.   

Logic is a universal language. If making the investment in machines saves money because machines  are a faster, more durable form of non- human  industrial laboriousness that cancels human jobs but leads to you earning less return/ less money, then we are in an economic stalemate or system failure. 

You earn less money because there are fewer people around with money. This is because they are not working like they used to. The economy can no longer rely on employed people to be a consumer base when there are fewer employed people who can buy the goods that provides the company a return on investment. 

We create an artificially funded consumer base that is just as eternal and certain as the machine in how we fund them. Whether they have a job or no job with jobs being so uncertain, they will at least have funding to achieve the purpose of consumering and buying goods so the producers of goods have certain returns. 

 A war is just the same artificiality in Stimulus and shares the same government funding but costs more in the end.  You have lost a consumer in the War  and also in preparation for the same too often, lost that  that consumer who you wanted to fill the town and buy the vehicle, have children and they would buy the vehicle and that new home.  But, where are they? 

Economic Stalemate/ System failure or Recession is avoided if we input the necessary and certain moneys into the lives of the workers who are those persons soon to be former workers. 

It's the balance of energy in the production of goods with the energy involved in the selling of goods as tied to the consumer's buying of these goods. 

This balancing is one of the last bastions of manual labour in the human experience. It does not happen in the automatic. There is no invisible hand from God like Keynes said in deceiving a generation or two. 

Energy must balance on both sides of any system as it is a system involving energy and productivity. See the examples of H2+ O= H2O or water. In this equation the energy must balance on both sides for the H20 or water to be seen. If you interrupt it, then the water is not seen.    

Energy used in producing consumer goods  EQUALS Energy used in the consumers' acquiring of goods.

We put a sufficient amount of money on production of goods on the left  and the consumers' acquiring of goods produced on the right.  This is to understand the balance of energy that must be achieved to avoid any stalemate or recession in the economy. It does not have to be an exact dollar for dollar investment on both sides but we find the right amount so the industrialist and the government and private interests who invested are happy along with consumers or the people who inhabit your economy. Any people will do so, without hatred, why not use the white, red and brown people you already have? It will cost if you don't fund them use them.  

You might have to bring Iranians and Saudis etc since the investment you have made to build thousands of new condo units cannot wait. They have money. If you can't think lovingly or logically, let your people die off and just bring their people to love, enjoy and thrive over you. 

You F-ck up again when you don't  just fund your own peoples.  They are probably 1/4 Ukrainian, 1/4 Irish, 1/4 Amerindian and 1/4 West Indian. You should have put one penny a minute into the economy as consistent consumer stimulus in 1936 to avoid  all recession and depression. 

This provides a certain balance. We put money investment into the industrial process achieving the supply of goods with the purchase of machines that save time and money. So we put money into the consumer who is often the formerly employed to get the consistency in the consuming of goods to ensure certain returns. We provide a purposeful, balancing drop of money  on the consumer stimulus side that matches out  the money paid into the manufacturing investment side. It could be as little as 8 cents a minute. 

The nice thing about this is that we can gauge consumer stimulus as Mr. Lyon, a student in the Doctoral program at UCL points out, in pennies per minute.   We can gauge consumer stimulus at pennies per minute. 

Gauge the Improvement on Investment.

We can gauge the improvement in returns on investment also therefore and actually see the increased returns on investment across the economy.

This is once we provide this 8 cents a minute or 17 cents a minute to the consumer. How do the returns on investment improve at 17 cents a minute vs the current rate of 6 cents a minute in Ontario vs the 8 cents a minute in Québec; and the 8 cents a minute in California? Sales go up and splatter all over the charts. 

By SDGCK. Now you gots to chill and if not, you are not down with SDGCK.