Click here. The Black Cross continues with it's new management since 2008; the Old White Lion is now included also in Finchley. Our service is now card only for all transactions before 9 pm. We are open from 8 am; Monday to Sunday. We have new bar staff contractors who have arrived who will, like others previously, operate his own tap card on his account. The livery is paid on Friday directly by the pub. We are alive and happy. We have chosen responsible people to work with us who have Territorial Army associations (at least one year of experience). The OWL administration will be working with us.

 Click here.  

The Black Cross continues with it's new management since 2008; the Old White Lion is now included also in Finchley.  Our service is now card only  for all transactions before 8:30 pm.   We are open from 8 am; Monday to Sunday. We have new bar staff contractors who have arrived  who will, like others previously, operate his own tap card on his account.   The livery is paid on Friday directly by the pub.  

We are alive and happy.  We have chosen responsible people to work with us who have Territorial Army associations (at least one year of experience).  The OWL administration will be working with us. 

This is a non profit operating structure as we reserve the right to provide services and receive the reasonable donation as paid on a non profit basis.  The operator or contactor has confirmed he is not an employee but is receiving a stipend for his volunteer service to our charity/church management group. The contractor has arrived and set up his machine, must be a machine for the hours indicated, because he agrees to the basic terms. 

 Don't think there is any exception if you are related to a bus driver.  There is no code  from us required to send the wire transfer.

If the three key payments outlined below are not sent, the money credited in to your account will be reversed.  Once you have sent them both, the money is retained in your account. Then you can return the next day and succeed again.  

If you were there to assist and did not get through, please send us an email and let us know your experience. I'm Sorry it didn't work but you will always get 10% off your food orders. Thank you. 

All pubs are monitored.   There is a zero tolerance response to any failures to agree with procedures as noted below. 

The contractor will expect £200.00 per day from his efforts.  Your account will be debited for 22% per day. This is sales tax and also the livery delivery and Alcohol license fee.  

 Two existing staffers on site since 2010 will open and close and will expect the volunteer stipend of £130.00 for their work at the end of the day as paid  from the cash only orders collected at 8:30 pm  to closing.    This is paid for with the cash only orders at end of day. The operation is card only before 8:30  pm. 

We expect all payments to be made. If there is no special exceptions then by 11:59 pm in the usual case after collecting for the bar all day,  with the money transfer payments system in your online banking portal, £200.00 is paid per day and sent by money transfer to SDGCK Account with name Warren Lyon at CIBC Simplii Financial with account ending with the last 3 digits being 750. The details are below. 

Canadian Direct Deposit Details* Financial Institution 010 at CIBC Simplii Financial Canada. Transit number 30800 Name on Account: Warren Lyon. Account number 0110028750 Swift code : CIBCCATT.  

Email the .csv before 10 pm the same day to angelronan.sdgckwrite@blogger.com and to info.angelronan@mail.com.

There is one tap card box  for all operations that includes the pizza.

You will also pay to All Saints PCC High Wycombe
Sort code: 40-52-40, Account: 00012185 this amount: £15.00 per day.  

You will retain £200.00 per day in your account associated to the tap card machine for your work as Owl administration.   

The remainder you will transmit using  sort code   and account number to the New Testament Church of God UK at  Northampton or use the payment facilities at  https://ntcgnorthampton.org.uk/how-to-donate/

This money will be used to fund volunteer work experiences through the Church. The volunteers will receive a stipend. 

If you collected £1075.00 on the tap card box,  you must send £145.00, send £730.00 to the NTCG and retain £200.00 for your work.  

If you collect at the pub  and also  make the requisite payments  for ten days, you will get a two year mooring at the location.  You can hire someone to collect on your box if you cannot be there personally.  If you collect but fail to pay only once, you can no longer collect in a zero tolerance policy.  

You will keep the tap card earnings on account set at £200.00 per day and the amount will be pending until the work is completed that includes sending the CSV by email to info.angelronan@mail.com by 10:00 pm. 

  This is not too honerous in terms of tasks.   

If you do not make these 3 requisite payments and send the .CSV file from the tap card box app,  you cannot return there except as a customer. The tap card collection may be cancelled entirely and the funds retained.  

 If you steal 9 apples and sell them out of your hat at the overground station, you will be independent but nicked. 

If you are interested in being an operator full time or part time, let us know. Send your resume to us using this email address: info.angelronan@mail. com. 

SDGCK is now producing a £ 5 Hot Dog  and French Fries special at the Black Cross in Crouch End, North London near the Barclays Bank. You pay £8 if you include  a drink.  James Greenwich will be running a long term PERFETTO Pizza pop up at the Black Cross.   "Give me..Free";  The PERFETTO menu  and orders begin on Monday with a simple take out and eat in menu. See the sign in the window for the medium and large only pizzas; competitively priced at £5 and £10.The pizzas are super veggie, the Tuna, the Cheese, the ground beef and the Pepperoni; same price. If you want extra sauce or extra cheese just say, "  double sauce  and double cheese...no charge".   You get your extra sauce and cheese at no extra charge. The agreement  and licensing fee is set for payment by 11:00 pm.  The Operators at Black Cross send their daily work sheets to info.angelronan@mail.com. 

Click here. By the SDGCK FIRM. It is to understand the economy as a system and not argue about that. It is to accept that money must flow from the government to the intended users of money with as little resistance as possible so we keep the cost of money very low and always. The cost is the interest rate. If it's low, then people will join in finance opportunities. But this is not money. This is the cost; the cost of borrowing. The Fed is the lending arm and also hard cash shipment and deliverer of hard cash. This Fed interest rate covers the basic costs of money services and money delivery.

  The Federal Reserve.

24/04/2026. 

Click here. 

By the SDGCK FIRM.  

It is to understand the economy as a system and not argue about that. 

It is to accept that money must flow from the government to the intended users of money with as little resistance as possible so we keep the cost of money very low and always. The cost is the interest rate. If it's low, then people will join in finance opportunities. But this is not money. This is the cost; the cost of borrowing. The Fed is the lending arm and also hard cash shipment and deliverer of hard cash. This Fed interest rate covers the basic costs of money services and money delivery.  

The Fed also supervises electronic money transfers across North America with most North American banks carrying a Fed Wire ABA number. 

They  also manage electronic cash delivery to the general public particularly in the form of electronic benefits payments. This is delivered primarily through the States benefits programmes that includes the Federal arm of SNAP as part of the Federal Reserve's management of real consumer stimulus.  This is the real SNAP count. 

The Fed most importantly has to ensure actual money gets to people. The key reason is consumer stimulus and the ability to pay for goods and life in the general cost of living that includes, as we can see, borrowing at times.  The average brand new vehicle across the United States cannot be bought on benefits without borrowing or it could be if you have been a resident of some states all your life. Most people finance the acquisition of the vehicle or the home.  They finance all kinds of other consumer products. 

Our concern at the Fed is that the absence of emphasis on real and consistent consumer stimulus has evaded the focal point or hub of discussion across the Fed and within Fed statements.  Real Stimulus must be done and has to be done.  We set national minimum standards that must be complied with by the states for the yearly amount of benefits paid per citizen in every state; also in every Canadian province and territory.   That minimum is now at $ USD 40,000.00 per year. Ideally, it should be $ USD 70,0000.00 per year.  This is consumer stimulus.  Here, we stop the conversation. We point out that the international economic community is more than Coca Cola and our dear Microsoft 365 branded products. 

There are other brands and the corporations that own them who have taken significant risk and stakes in the American economy; as stakeholders.  It is not any longer the case that if America sneezed economically the world catches a cold since the Ukraine is a larger consumer market with heavily financed consumers that are flush with their Ukrainian national benefits, consuming through Amazon and various other retailers.  They buy Ford Tata and line the Mach E  also Benz products. They buy Nikes and Converse  but more ably than any English population,  arriving at the final answer following robotics  and mechanised labor three  generations ago.   Russia is the same; so is all of Europe.  We are way behind if it's a question of consistent stimulus and the amount per North American citizen in our economy.   But these international interests and stake holders could become very angry, disappointed since they have made long term  investments in America and they are stake holders now like Coca Cola and  Budweiser.   No loss is tolerated. There is no need for loss caused by investment  in robotics, investment to make goods for presumably ready buyers but met unfortunately with insufficient or unsteady consumer demand or buying power. Loss occurs when robotics cancels jobs in the production process.  When the jobs are canceled, the consumer cannot pay for his goods.  Here, we see the problem. Money is invested in producing goods with a 24 hour per day robotic production consistency.  Automation and AI are the rule now and not human labour or work.  

To be happy, what is a penny(1 ¢) worth a minute  as invested in consumer stimulus to ensure the same consistency in available regular consumer activity that the average consumer across America can fulfill the most essential consequence of the whole system which is to buy, consume and generate the requisite sale that generates  the requisite earnings;  that we call revenue and also profit? A penny a minute per consumer as provided to every consumer may have been sufficient to achieve requisite, sufficient consumer spending in the 1920's and 1930's.   For this system essential in the current era; to avoid borrowing people and families from other lands, we are happy to input as much as 17¢ per minute in real STIMULUS from the Fed through it's state and coordinated SNAP programmes, throughout it's CUSMA influence and programmes to ensure there is sufficient consumer STIMULUS for all of North America in every country for every citizen.   

The Cost of Borrowing (the interest rate)  is kept low as not to impede  what ever borrowing that is requisite to fulfil Purchasing.  This is because the economy is hoping to see not only coffee and candy absorbed by the economy at all times but the larger consumer items that involve homes and vehicles. Homes and vehicles require finance.  If we do not comply with logic and provide all consumers this small sum (¢17 cents per minute),  the system is imbalanced.  Homes are empty and the brand new vehicles that remained unsold as built for the US end up all over the world at tremendous discount. The US towns are empty in the local violence that sometimes ensues in a country suffering a plethora of cheap personal arms and munitions as we failed the true snap count; counting the cost of benefits to sustain life in North America; counting the cost of agreement with the UDHR.   The violence instigated by national policy that says not all Americans had money portends  violence.  See the Dillinger file.   

 So then here we focus on our new appreciation of the minutia of the Cost of Money and STIMULUS. The interest rate  that represents the cost of money may move up and down by a point as 1.3% moves to 1.4% or down to 1.2% interest. This only improves the cost of borrowing. But this does not enable Actual Real Stimulus in the ability to pay the loan. The consumer needs the Ability To Pay since   reducing the rate only lessens the cost of borrowing but does not enable the actual payment of the loan or provide actual money to purchase the goods.  We can improve that in small increments at  pennies per minute; ¢17 cents per minute to be exact.  We can also improve Actual Real Stimulus across North America. We have the nexus and system call to lead.  You can see already that if the US Fed changes it's rate up or down, the Canadian Central Bank follows.  The Fed rate should never be higher than 1.5%. Raising it retards borrowing and economic activity. It retards STIMULUS.  We thank Gerome for his work in this regard. 

Real STIMULUS maintained through the BENEFITS should be relatively consistent so people can Finance their life and make payments consistently with certainty over the usual average borrowing cycle of 5 to 10 years for most Home Appliance or Vehicle finance arrangements or Home leases or the mortgage.  

Consistency  In STIMULUS between $40000.00 to $70000.00 across North America stands as the goal.  But this  also now in the long term the problem. Why is it not the same amount across the whole economy like other countries? We could accept some variation in amount paid  from one country to the other; but within the same country, it should be the same amount paid to all.  It would be best if the amount to all across North America is roughly the same. The food and products we buy are essentially the same and so is the news we watch in addition to the methods by which we pay for goods. The cost is essentially the same with some exchange rate variation.   

 Unlike other countries, the benefit paid  is not the same across the whole economy.  It is not equally measured stimulus across the economy.  But when you raise the rate by 1%, it impacts all consistently regardless of the consumer STIMULUS money paid to them.  So a 1% increase in the Fed rate  or in some other factors impacting the cost of living may affect some more than others nonetheless since some are receiving less than others from the government. Some are receiving more; and those receiving less  may suffer defaults in payment and abandonment of homes or abandonment of whole towns across North America.  

 Oshawa was somewhat abandoned but it is being re-occupied by Red and Yellow Asians who can pay the rent and car payments. The Oshawa locals have suffered increases in cost of living that outpaces the current amount of benefits received that has not increased since 1980. The benefit is paid at higher amounts in Quebec, the Yukon, Manitoba and the NWT contrary to s.15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.   The international economy does not share the  local affinities and willingness to absorb the local fascination with unhappiness.  We must accept that this benefit must be paid equally when we contribute equally in sales tax. All provinces are also contributing their share of raw natural resources to the GDP but resource provision is not the reason for the difference in benefits paid.  We can see that.   

The Canadians ran to Oklahoma, Florida, Minnesota, Texas and Massachusetts looking for hope. The absence of consistent government paid  benefits after robotic automation and AI with the joblessness that ot causes is a  pull and push factor in a reverse migration; back south.  Kawartha or Kanata Trees and lakes are not enough to make a population stay settled. They need money for food, heat and electricity. They can't just skin and eat a beaver for daily sustenance. How do you catch a beaver?  But maybe you might buy more pork chops if you have the money.  

Love costs money. Then, she can have the six babies a year and help repopulate at 8 pounds gestation in two months. She can travel at the speed limit and also go beyond the limit.  Either way, she can think. She will have the baby and you will support her in what she is doing.   She can think. 

 So, we have to find the balance in benefits that works for the entire North American economy. We spent billions in government loans from tax dollars to help all kinds of companies out with retooling of the factory facilities that we now understand and refer to this retooling as automation; not just for vehicles but vacuum cleaners, breads, cookies crackers, milk, beers, cakes  and light bulbs made by machine.  

Follow the guise of automation, we spend a purposeful amount on ourselves too since I don't get to go to all the company picnics but indirectly maybe we financed the food provided there. So we spend a purposeful amount on ourselves at ¢ CAD 17 cents per minute; every citizen that includes the factory employees.  

The goal is REAL CONSUMER STIMULUS for all of  North America with a consistent $ USD 70000.00  per anum( USD 13 cents/ per minute or $7.99 per hour)  across all of North America. That works out to about $ CAD 90,000.00 per anum( ¢ CAD 17 cents a minute).   This is then  Base Rate Stimulus; ¢ USD 13 cents a minute as essentially the Rate of Stimulus. We are not paying the machines any money but we provide the machine a kilowatt of energy  per hour or per minute for it's function and  labour. That is the rate of energy.   We pay the consumer a corollary amount for his function and consuming; a purposeful rate of Stimulus  as financial energy,  a factor of energy that powers the consumer to buy with a tap, a swipe, insertion or online payment.

  The Base Rate of Stimulus is the rate of energy in terms of ability to pay  made available to the consumer to achieve consistent buying power, demand and ability pay.  

The requisite amount achieves all UDHR needs, all economic consumer stimulus needs for all products in all sectors of the economy. Maybe it's that 3 storey, 4 bed town house in Missouri, Tijuana, Kansas or Campbellford, Ontario.   You will have enough money as a Canadian, Mexican or American to get where you intend to get to and start your ownership or lease of the property. 

 We could increase this base rate as a bonus sometimes to celebrate a good lunar mission or success at the Olympics.  The Canadians can set their own increases and so can the Americans or the Mexicans. It might be an extra penny on the amount paid monthly in that celebration.  

Our earlier comments last year about the power of leadership to resolve the economic anxiety in North America is based on the leadership capabilities of the Fed or the POTUS or both in the productive and positive outflows of our mutual North American endeavour to keep North America occupied and secured;  by North Americans hopefully or mostly.  Yet if you build twelve 80- storey condominiums over 3 years you will need more people from some where to occupy those new  homes and built spaces. We allow a reasonable amount of immigration to satisfy this new supply of homes but all in the North American economy will have enough money to participate.  

  We accept the power of the international economy nonetheless to occupy our indecisive way in this regard that has festered in spite of all our electrified EBT and money transfer capabilities; to then reoccupy North America with people that amount to nothing more than, from the international average, just another average family that is usually Asian or Islamic with the average moneys that the economy and market demands they will have; as paid by their government but they are living in and occupying North America with those moneys.  You failed to occupy and hold your territory. Occupation of  and holding a territory requires money. Look at what we have seen, face to face. 

Our last concern in spite of all the technologies available to us is the failure of the human to provide services to the population. There is a certain degree of automation in the benefits system that must  be implemented to defeat any willingness of some badly motivated  human beings to sabotage the benefits or bank accounts of persons in the targeted citizen groups; rendering them abandoned, marooned. Is there a social worker who disabled the benefits on black men in her assigned neighborhoods or service areas? Is there an old Postal worker and his wife who thought they would send the payments but interrupted them when the family was buying a house or vehicle to seek an extortionate payment from that family.  He read the Jungle Book and decided that people should give them something since he declared himself the Ogre and King of that region. He said why do they need to buy a house for or a vehicle when all you need is the bare necessities? They were arrested for fraud, extortion and attempted murder in Canada. We suggest a card with App and a bank account. 

The international economy reoccupies  the territory when you fail to agree with your own financed North American existence. Instead of the North American, we  see other peoples from Asia  in whole and entire regions( like South Asians in  Daytona or Compton) achieving the final consequence of the international economic system and that is a real North American sale; not a theft by a hungry, angry mistreated North American human being suffering a financial genocide ( in the actual North American  genocide); but a real, quantifiable and happy sale of robotically made goods. I'm a Democrat really but no matter what is going on I vote for the North American lives. 

Warren A. Lyon, Researcher, Fellow and Director 

As read by Dino Cussuglino and Byron Hessging, SDGCK Fellows. 

The SDGCK FIRM on behalf of the US Federal Reserve ( on contract). 

Final- 

Buy this poster framed for $300.00 without the editorial. Angel Ronan with SDGCK. See us at the Heritage Law Centre with the calm and casually dressed volunteers and SDGCK Directors. We are now meeting at the Unionville Alliance Church. Confirm your interest as an SDGCK Director or volunteer by sending us an email to heritagelawcentre@gmail.com. We are also meeting at Hullmark Centre.

 

 Buy this poster framed for $300.00 without the editorial.  Angel Ronan with SDGCK. See us at the Heritage Law Centre with the calm and casually dressed volunteers and SDGCK Directors. We are now meeting at the Unionville Alliance Church.  Confirm your interest as an SDGCK Director or volunteer by sending us an email to heritagelawcentre@gmail.com.  We are also meeting at Hullmark Centre. 

ANGEL RONAN SDGCK FIRM.

 

Click here. From the Angel Ronan "I love Canada" Series: It's the law that benefits are to be paid equally all across Canada so the interruption of this inequality and the salaries earned pursuant to the same 30 years ago in the maintaining of this inequality could be forfeited since it was a violation of the job contracts, not just a mistake, when no one is paid to break the law. You were also told, warned not to do it. But the government employees affected by this who are vicariously liable for what happened and who didn't get their benefits in an ongoing interruption will also get their benefit arrears if any and so the benefits will be paid to every Canadian in all provinces and territories at $90,000.00 per year. There is a verbal error so we could only aspire to be a White American President since "they was" trying to tell us to believe in the American dream. This is what I like about America. It's Creole relaxed and you can say Creole things like they was and get a highway named after you but you can't graduate from Harvard High School with saying"... they was." Why dom't we change the laws of grammar to help the president? But, even if we do, we should at least ensure all North Americans are getting their benefits because if they are not, that is something we can agree is super wrong as Donald says even if we can tolerate ourselves speaking badly, speaking rather badly on global TV. But, it's ok. We are big and we will eat big with a big American benefit that is at least satisfying to the market and the major company's requirements for regular, steady sales of goods. They want to buy a ticket to a basketball game in another state or country, Canada or Mexico, and fly to the game, buy their food and enjoy their hotel stays with their $ USD 70,000.00 per year as benefit which is equal to about $ CAD 90,000.00 a year per Canadian. The MLS and NBA may expand to Mexico and Puerto Rico where they have been paying at least $30,000.00 per year income support to their citizens. "They was" very happy about this. But we see it's still not resolved in Canada. We believe that the government in Canada can do something about this and comply with the Court. We cannot run a government that foments divisiveness with DNA that once strangled and beat the Nun on the native reserve for her insistent that we learn how to make the soap to wash and press the white shirt and black gowns. The white side in the same soul that today looks kind of Indiataliano very often may want revenge for her busted face but we wear rayon now that washes easy and is also easy to iron. Also we cannot strangle,starve and beat ourselves in almost exact expressiveness of this jambalaya DNA when we can at least all agree that we cannot enjoy a Go bus or a town full of near dead people. If they are near dead, it's our fault. The economy has to work. The benefit has to be paid. We cannot scapegoat the Rex. We had access to solve it. We can maybe still solve it or call someone who can. Do you still have access? Equal benefits is the law under the 14th amendment and the S.15 of the Canadian charter. We don't know what is wrong with people but we need someone with the guts, a chutney soul, to enforce the law. Donald says he understands the law about money and benefits where he does not need approval from Congress for this one so we make it work since it looks like someone or "they was_ trying to kill us off, starve us out as North Americans from within. Donald is here now and he sees Coca Cola is anathema to tariffs. Donald agrees. We cannot continue to see our economy hemorrhagic-ally lose people over the benefits.

 

Click here. 

From the Angel Ronan "I love Canada" Series: 

It's the law that benefits are to be paid equally all across Canada so the interruption of this inequality and the salaries earned pursuant to the same 30 years ago  in the maintaining of this inequality could be forfeited since it was a violation of the job contracts, not just a mistake, when no one is paid to break the law. You were also told, warned not to do it.   But the government employees affected by this who are vicariously liable for what happened and who didn't get their benefits in an ongoing interruption will also get their benefit arrears if any and so the benefits will be paid to every Canadian in all provinces and territories at $90,000.00 per year. There is a verbal error so we could only aspire to be a White  American President since "they was" trying to tell us to believe in the American dream. This is what I like about America. It's Creole relaxed and you can say Creole things like they was and get a highway named after you but you can't graduate from Harvard High School with saying"... they was." Why dom't we change  the laws of grammar to help the president?  But, even if we do, we should at least ensure all North Americans are getting their benefits because if they are not,  that is something we can agree is super wrong as Donald says even if we can tolerate ourselves speaking badly,  speaking rather badly on global TV.  But, it's ok. We are big and we will eat big with a big American benefit that is at least satisfying to the market and the major company's requirements for regular, steady sales of goods. They want to buy a ticket to a basketball game in another state or country, Canada or Mexico, and fly to the game, buy their food and enjoy their hotel stays with their $ USD 70,000.00 per year as benefit which is equal to about $ CAD 90,000.00 a year per Canadian. The MLS and NBA may expand to Mexico and Puerto Rico where they have been paying at least $30,000.00 per year income support to their citizens.  "They was" very happy about this. But we see it's still not resolved in Canada. We believe that the government in Canada can do something about this and comply with the Court.   We cannot run a government that foments divisiveness with DNA that once strangled and beat  the Nun on the native reserve for her insistent that we learn how to make the soap to wash and press the white shirt and black gowns. The white side in the same soul that today looks  kind of Indiataliano very often may want revenge for her busted  face but we wear rayon now that washes easy and is also easy to iron. Also we cannot strangle,starve and beat ourselves in almost  exact expressiveness of this jambalaya DNA when we can at least all agree that we cannot enjoy a Go bus or a town full of  near dead people. If they are near dead, it's our fault.  The economy has to work. The benefit has to be paid. We cannot scapegoat the Rex. We had access to solve it. We can maybe still solve it or call someone who can. Do you still have access? Equal benefits is the law under the 14th amendment and the S.15 of the Canadian charter. We don't know what is wrong with people but we need someone with the guts, a chutney soul,  to enforce the law. Donald says he understands the law about money  and benefits where  he does not need approval from Congress for this one so we make it work since it looks like someone or "they was_ trying to kill us off, starve us out as North Americans from within. Donald is here now and he sees Coca Cola is anathema to tariffs. Donald agrees. We cannot continue to see our economy hemorrhagic-ally lose people over the benefits. 

A Photograph of the Canadian Parliament and Cabinet. It's a nice photo. (.     ) 

This is a photo of the local McDonald's Restaurant team and Management in your area. Look at them hustle. It's a nice photo. (.     ). 

This is a photo of the Operations team that will get Canada going pursuant to the laws. (.     ).

 Yet, we are not fighting Iran but ourselves when the benefits are not paid to our people and then the Iranians come to live in Canada or the UK as refugees that thrive over us with their Iranian benefits that covers them and enables them to help themselves and their people regardless of how the English bank may hold their UK benefits and never credit their UK bank  account. The pay the  rent for the fish and chips shop  and then they buy the building, buy the whole block.  So, the English guy who is probably a White African, innit?, after all the wars has an Iranian landlord. You see in some parts of the UK, there are four kebab shops and one fish and chips shop on the main high road; on average. This is because the population determines the market for food, the demand for food.  But, we can do something right since now we see the issue and it won't matter tomorrow since the kebab is here to stay. We will have enough to buy more and these people are making many babies, some white and some black, who will have the taste for kebabs and who will.pray and wash their hands after football with their Nikes or Diadoras on; innit? So we pay the benefits. 

You are being occupied, over run like the beach in Skegness, full of hot sand and cool happy, fresh water.  The UK people  are disappearing because of it. As such, the Iranian and other foreigners with their more certain national benefits fill  the vacancy in population that the  fraudulent Canadian employees have created in not paying the benefits to Canadians. Since there is a Court order on the issue, it's contempt of Court.  It must be paid equally to all citizens. But, you started this game in 1980 on the day of the wedding of the current Rex with Diana in the UK and Canada to only ask what he will do, as if to park a social and economic time bomb at his  front door. But you cause the problem in your alleged job with  access to government matters and then you criticise him. You suggest you would take the country and break away to leave in some declaration of independence but you can't leave when you are not a state; nor are you an independent country and how do you say you would leave when you are guilty for the benefit  mess? This is written by you as a  Canadian who has finally confessed. You are a hero.  You will send the benefits tomorrow.  

 McDonalds has been more determined to use the best of everything to provide services and product.  The government, however is the only legal entity that takes more than 14% of everything. But, its not working as we would expect. We see the golden rule in school as financed by the government but we do not see it in the national or provincial benefits.  There is an unusual kingdom within a kingdom phenomena  as to active works that defy policy. "Ontario Works" is that phenomena or activity in defiance of S.15 of the Charter so its unconstitutional and you would not use a notwithstanding clause for this in "spite" so people have to suffer unequal treatment in Kingston or Orangeville or Halton where the benefits are not paid.  We should not try to rationalize it.  The purpose of the benefit is not to foster desperate congestion. It is to keep people moving and ensure there is no hungry crowding around Toronto with people hiding in subway tunnels and then trying to take a house when people are on vacation.  IF they have money, they can keep moving.  Nonetheless, we see that if overcrowding was your concern, you would never have built soo many buildings in the GTA.  You intend to see people and lots people.  Your attitudes toward this benefit have been unsupported by any rationale. We need for our lives. We need it paid equally. That is the law. That is the culture. Anything else is appalling and unjustifiable; shoo!   See that there are already rulings on this issue.

See: 

Fraser v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 SCC 28, confirmed that facially neutral pension policies causing adverse impacts based on gender (e.g., denying pension buy-backs for job-sharing RCMP officers) violate Section 15(1) Charter equality rights. It established that "choice" does not negate discrimination when policies perpetuate historical, systemic disadvantages.

Similar Judgements and Key Equality Cases:

• Quebec (Attorney General) v. Alliance du personnel professionnel et technique de la santé et des services sociaux, 2018 SCC 17: A landmark pay equity case and one of the few successful s. 15(1) claims based on sex prior to Fraser, focusing on gender-based wage discrimination.
• Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61: Established that providing services to the public must ensure equal access to benefits, often cited in conjunction with adverse impact discrimination cases.
• Withler v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 12: Addressed the"appropriate comparator" analysis for section 15 claims, emphasizing a substantive, not formalistic, approach to benefit equality.
• British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU, 1999 SCC 32 (Meiorin): While an employment law case, it set the standard for testing if discriminatory standards (like physical fitness tests) are bona fide occupational requirements, heavily influencing the "adverse impact" analysis in Fraser.
• Canadian National Railway Co. v. Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission), 1987 SCC 79 (Action Travail des Femmes): A foundational case establishing that systemic discrimination must be remedied, even if not intentionally designed to exclude, closely aligning with the principles in Fraser. 

These cases collectively emphasize that true equality requires looking beyond neutral rules to the actual, disproportionate effects they have on disadvantaged groups.  

Why would you do that; dammit Patricio Brown? I think we should give him an award  and degree from Northwestern University or from  Carlton University; the best in politics.   If the charter says benefits must be essentially equal with some differences we agree to for disabilities, then how do I ask you to sign up for a program that confirms you have no money because you did not get the benefits others received and then pay you less ($10,000.00 per year) than those who actually receive the benefit at $30000.00 per year.  The kid who applied for Ontario Works suffered a fraud by his father who wanted to receive all the benefits in the family. The system has to be prepared for these fraudsters and their way or rule cannot over rule the love and order of the king. You are getting $30000.00 per year without interruption living next door. As to equality across the country, this number is too low and should approximate $90,000.00 per year; give or take a few thousand so it might be $87000.00 or $92000.00 per year.    $90000.00 per year  is fine paid to your bank account at $7500.00 per year.   If its not working like this, who decides that it is not working?   If it comes to benefits, we could design  a system that provides a presto benefit card that will pay the monthly cash benefits to the card immediately for debit payments until you may opt online in the presto benefit system to have the benefits paid to your bank account.  The system would also pay all equally.  If you have arrears, you can make claim for those arrears on the presto benefit system and opt for the number of years to see the pay down of those arrears from 1 year up to 30 years. This is not difficult once we see how much we pay civil servants; sometimes $2,000,000.00 per year.  So arrears of $ 1,200,000.00 etc is not an issue if its just the benefit we are receiving together so we can go on a ski trip as grade 8 alumni friends in our 40's etc.  Bring your family.     You can opt to see your benefits in the presto system pay the benefit daily, weekly, every two weeks or monthly.  In those emergencies where you have lost your bank or presto  benefit card, you could use your health card for payment at the store. If you offered some kid to be the  Boss of... and  hope to steal his benefits to see him dead for your ego and for your sins, how does that work when its your sin and adding one more can't really help to clear it?  There is no deal. But if you can build such intelligent new subways that are designed to save people, keep people safe, then you can design benefit systems that keep people safe.  The Kingdom is maintained sometimes by violence and when interrupted by hatred and the evil, The Kingdom removes the interruptions; to take it back by force.  

Click here.   

The whole Canadian experience is kind of a fraud.  We sing and cheer for the sports teams. We spend money for flags and sheets. They dress up for the games and fix the hair really nice and smile for the cameras. All of this happens and then  many Canadians are not receiving their benefits.  If the MP knew that there is just one Canadian that is  not receiving their benefit, we believe he would resolve it the next day so that all the Canadians received their benefits equally or what else is he doing and why?

We thank them for their assistance. 

 It’s incredibly frustrating to feel like there is a "performance" of national pride while the basic systems that are supposed to support citizens aren't functioning. When you see the pomp and circumstance of sports or public events, it can feel like a slap in the face if you're struggling to navigate a bureaucracy that feels indifferent to your actual needs.

How would you feel about a politician named Sayed, Johnson or Geronimo that does not help your friends get their benefits?  They have known for months after recieving assistance requests from him and also after recieving information from the local benefits office. You see the benefit all others are recieving is not a matter of means testing qualifications above the basic evidence of citizenship. You get it when you are a citizen. On the day of provision in 1985, he was living in the right town in Ontario. 

Your frustration with your Member of Parliament (MP) is shared by many. The expectation is that they are your direct line to the government—the person who fixes the "glitch in the machine."

Why isn't the MP fixing it "the next day"?

While it should be that simple, here is a bit of insight into why these delays happen and what your MP is actually doing:

 * Jurisdictional Separation: Often, the benefits people are missing are provincial (like ODSP or OHIP) while your MP handles federal issues (like EI, CPP, or CRA). If you contact an MP about a provincial issue, they technically have no power over it, and vice versa for an MPP.

 * The "Case File" Process: When you bring a problem to an MP, their staff opens a Constituency Case. They have "hotlines" to government agencies, but they are still subject to the same backlogs as everyone else. They can't usually override the law; they can only force a human to actually look at your file.

 * Policy vs. Individual Fixes: MPs spend their time in Ottawa debating laws (the "big picture"). Unfortunately, this often takes them away from the "small picture"—the individual Canadian who hasn't received a cheque.

How to hold them accountable

If you or someone you know is being denied benefits, the "smiling for the camera" doesn't help. Here is how you can move past the fluff:

 * The "In-Person" Squeaky Wheel: Emails are easy to ignore. Calling the constituency office and requesting an in-person meeting with the Caseworker (not just the MP) is often more effective.

 * The Taxpayer Ombudsman: If the CRA is the issue, there is a specific office (the Office of the Taxpayers’ Ombudsman) designed to handle these failures when the MP route isn't working.

 * Media and Public Record: Sometimes, reminding an MP that "one Canadian not receiving benefits" is a news story helps speed up their "next day" timeline.

It’s valid to feel like the "Canadian experience" is out of sync with reality when the safety net has holes in it.

This is not the service we are paying for though as we are believing in the politicians to give life to our expectations of law and compliance with that law. 

We thank them for their assistance. 

They are amazing if we can actually see and receive the benefit. 

SDGCK; We are here to help you!

  

Bo knows...Geronimo knows....

  You are correct that the U.S. government is sued frequently and loses (or settles) regularly in tort cases. However, this happens because the government **waived** its immunity for specific situations through the **Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) of 1946**. Before 1946, you generally could not sue the U.S. government for a tort at all.

If your legal strategy is based on the idea that immunity does not exist or is currently being pierced by these lawsuits, here is the functional breakdown of how those "wins" actually happen in court.

### 1. The "Win" Mechanism: The FTCA

When litigants win against the U.S. government, they are usually succeeding under the FTCA (28\ U.S.C.\ \S\ 1346(b)). This law acts as a "limited waiver." It says the U.S. will accept liability **only if** a private person would be liable under the same circumstances according to the law of the place where the act occurred.

To be the "appropriate litigant" and win, you must navigate these specific FTCA rules:

 * **The Administrative Claim:** You cannot go straight to court. You must first file a **Standard Form 95 (SF-95)** with the specific federal agency involved. If they deny it or don't respond within six months, only then can you file a lawsuit.

 * **The Named Defendant:** Even if an official made the statement, the **only** proper defendant in an FTCA suit is **"The United States of America."** If you name a specific department or individual, the court will often dismiss the case or automatically substitute the U.S. as the defendant.

### 2. Identifying the Litigant for "Offensive Statements"

If the goal is to sue for statements regarding the "death of a civilization" that offended people of Iranian descent, the legal path usually targets these specific categories of tort:

 * **Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED):** This is the most common "tort of offense." To win, a litigant must prove the conduct was "outrageous and intolerable" and caused severe emotional trauma.

 * **Constitutional Torts (Bivens Claims):** If you argue the statement violated the **Fifth Amendment** (Equal Protection) by targeting a specific ethnic group, you might sue the specific officials who spoke.

### 3. The Litigant Hierarchy in Federal Court

To file 100 suits per person, you would need to organize the plaintiffs (the people of Iranian descent) as follows:

| Role | Entity to be Named |

|---|---|

| **Plaintiff** | The individual citizen/resident of Iranian descent. |

| **Defendant** | **The United States of America** (under FTCA) OR **The Specific Official** (under *Bivens*). |

| **Jurisdiction** | U.S. District Court (Federal). |

### 4. The "Discretionary Function" Obstacle

The reason the government wins many of these cases is a specific clause in the law called the **Discretionary Function Exception**. It states that the government cannot be sued for any act based upon the exercise of a "discretionary function," even if that discretion is abused.

Courts often rule that **public speech and policy statements** by high-ranking officials are discretionary acts of governance. To win, a litigant must prove that the official had a "non-discretionary duty" (a mandatory law they had to follow) that they broke by making the statement.

### Strategy for Bulk Filings

If you intend to file a massive volume of suits, the court will likely consolidate them into a single **Multi-District Litigation (MDL)** or a **Class Action**. This prevents the court system from being overwhelmed by thousands of individual trials for the same statement.

Are you looking for the specific addresses where the **Service of Process** (the legal notice) must be delivered for the U.S. Government?

To pursue a lawsuit against the United States government or the President for specific statements, the structure of your legal filing is critical. In the U.S. court system, you do not simply name the "White House," as it is a physical location and administrative office, not a legal entity that can be sued in its own name.

Here is the breakdown of who the appropriate litigants are for such a case:

### 1. The Correct Defendant (The Entity Sued)

 * **The United States of America:** If you are suing for a "Tort" (a civil wrong like emotional distress or harm caused by government speech), the **Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)** requires you to name the "United States of America" as the sole defendant.

 * **The President in their Official Capacity:** If the goal is to challenge the legality of the statement itself (seeking an injunction or a ruling that the statement was unconstitutional), you name the individual currently holding the office, e.g., *" [Name of President], in his official capacity as President of the United States."*

 * **The Attorney General:** As the "official representative" of the U.S. government in all legal matters, the Attorney General (Department of Justice) is often named in suits challenging federal policy or conduct.

### 2. The Practical Litigant Structure

If you were to file these suits, the "caption" of your lawsuit would look like this:

> **PLAINTIFFS:** [Name of Individual] and all others similarly situated of Iranian descent.

> **vs.**

> **DEFENDANTS:** The United States of America; and [Name of President], in his official capacity.

> 

### 3. Critical Immunity Realities

While you mentioned there is "no legal immunity," the Supreme Court has established two very high hurdles for cases involving Presidential speech:

 * **Absolute Civil Immunity:** In *Nixon v. Fitzgerald*, the Supreme Court ruled that the President has **absolute immunity** from civil damages for any acts within the "outer perimeter" of their official duties. This includes making public statements and foreign policy declarations.

 * **The "Official Act" Distinction:** Under the recent ruling in *Trump v. United States* (2024), statements made by the President to the public about matters of national concern are considered "official acts." This makes it nearly impossible to sue the President personally for money; instead, the suit must be against the **United States Government** as an institution.

### 4. Strategy for the "100 Suits" Approach

To manage a massive volume of litigants (all people of Iranian descent), a single individual or a group would typically file a **Class Action Lawsuit**.

 * **The Process:** You file one case on behalf of a "Class." If the judge certifies the class, a single win would apply to every person of Iranian descent in the country.

 * **The Goal:** You would be suing for **Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)** or a violation of **Equal Protection** under the 5th Amendment, arguing the statement targeted a specific ethnicity.

### Summary Table: Who to Serve

| If you want... | Name this Defendant | Who receives the papers? |

|---|---|---|

| **Money/Damages** | The United States of America | The U.S. Attorney for your District |

| **A Judicial Order** | The President (Official Capacity) | The Attorney General of the U.S. |

| **A Policy Change** | The Dept. of Justice | The Attorney General of the U.S. |

If you are proceeding with this, the first mandatory step is filing an **Administrative Claim** with the agency involved (or the Department of Justice) using **Standard Form 95**. You cannot step into a courtroom until that claim is filed and denied.

When suing the United States government for **Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)** or **Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (NIED)**, the legal framework is exceptionally rigid. Because you are pursuing a **Tort**, the case is governed by the **Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)**.

To successfully litigate this, you must satisfy the following procedural and substantive requirements:

### 1. The Mandatory First Step: The Administrative Claim

You cannot file a lawsuit in federal court until you have exhausted your administrative remedies.

 * **The Filing:** You must file a **Standard Form 95** with the Department of Justice or the specific agency responsible for the statements.

 * **The Waiting Period:** The government has **6 months** to respond. If they deny the claim or fail to respond, you then have the legal right to file a complaint in U.S. District Court.

 * **The Sum:** You must state a "sum certain" (a specific dollar amount) for the damages. In your case, this would be the calculated amount for every person of Iranian descent included in the suit.

### 2. Identifying the Litigants in the Complaint

In the formal court filing (the Complaint), the parties must be named as follows:

 * **The Plaintiffs:** The individual(s) suffering the distress. If filing for a large group, you would name a representative plaintiff (e.g., *"Joseph Anglia, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated"*).

 * **The Defendant:** **The United States of America.** Under the FTCA, you cannot name the President or an agency as a defendant for a tort; the law automatically substitutes the United States as the party responsible for the actions of its employees.

### 3. Proving Emotional Distress against the Sovereign

To win an IIED claim against the government, the burden of proof is high. You must demonstrate:

 * **Outrageous Conduct:** The statement "a whole civilization will die tonight" must be deemed "so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency."

 * **Intent or Recklessness:** The speaker intended to cause emotional distress or acted with deliberate disregard for the high probability that distress would occur.

 * **Causation and Severity:** The plaintiffs must prove they suffered "severe" emotional distress. In many states, this requires medical documentation or proof of physical manifestation of the stress.

### 4. The "Private Person" Standard

The FTCA states that the U.S. is liable only if a **private person** would be liable under the same circumstances. Your legal team would need to argue that if a private CEO made a public statement threatening the destruction of a civilization, they would be liable for the emotional trauma caused to the members of that civilization.

### Comparison of Litigant Roles

| Litigant Category | Entity | Legal Function |

|---|---|---|

| **Lead Plaintiff** | Representative of the Iranian-American community | Provides the "standing" to sue. |

| **Principal Defendant** | The United States of America | Holds the "deep pockets" for damage awards. |

| **Official Representative** | The U.S. Attorney General | Defends the government's actions in court. |

| **Subject of Inquiry** | The President / Spokesperson | The individual whose statements caused the alleged tort. |

### Risks to Consider

 * **The Discretionary Function Exception:** The government will likely argue that high-level statements about international conflict are "discretionary acts" of foreign policy, which are immune from tort suits under 28\ U.S.C.\ \S\ 2680(a).

 * **Free Speech Defense:** The government may argue that the statements are protected political speech, complicating a tort claim for emotional distress.