Football Cheers....

 

A photo....SDGCK in support of Angel Ronan.

 

SDGCK.

 

The Mother in Brooklyn. Ezekiel 16:8

  

The Mother in Brooklyn. 

Both Deborah (Judges 4–5) and the Proverbs 31 Woman (Proverbs 31:10–31) are among the most prominent, multifaceted female figures in the Hebrew Bible. While one is a historical/narrative figure called to publi

.c nation-building and spiritual leadership, and the other is a literastic/poetic ideal representing wisdom and resourcefulness, they share striking thematic overlaps.

Here is a comparative breakdown of their roles, qualities, and theological significance.

1. Profiles & Context

Feature	Deborah (Judges 4–5)	The Proverbs 31 Woman (Woman of Valor)
Genre / Source	Narrative history & ancient poetry (Song of Deborah)	Acrostic wisdom poetry (Eishet Chayil)
Primary Sphere	Public, national, civic, and military leadership	Domestic, commercial, economic, and household management
Key Titles / Descriptives	Prophetess (nebi'ah), Judge (shophet), "Mother in Israel" (em b'Yisrael)	"Woman of Valor / Worth" (Eishet Chayil)
Key Relationships	Wife of Lappidoth; co-leader alongside Barak	Wife of her husband (who is respected at the city gates); mother

2. Key Areas of Convergence

A. Valor and Strength (Chayil)

• Proverbs 31: She is explicitly introduced as an Eishet Chayil (v. 10), translated as "woman of valor," "virtuous woman," or "capable wife." The Hebrew term chayil often connotes strength, military vigor, capability, and nobility.
• Deborah: Embodies chayil in action. She leads Israel during a chaotic period under Canaanite oppression, directing military strategy alongside Barak and marching to the battlefield at Mount Tabor.

B. Wisdom, Counsel, and Public Respect

• Deborah: She sat under the Palm of Deborah between Ramah and Bethel, where Israelites came up to her for judgment, counsel, and conflict resolution (Judges 4:5). Her authority was recognized across tribes.
• Proverbs 31: "She opens her mouth with wisdom, and the teaching of kindness is on her tongue" (v. 26). Her household's success elevates her husband so that "he is known in the gates, when he sits among the elders of the land" (v. 23).

C. Resourcefulness and Enterprise

• Proverbs 31: Portrayed as an entrepreneur who evaluates fields and buys them, plants vineyards, oversees textile production, trades with merchants, and manages staff.
• Deborah: Demonstrates strategic vision—mobilizing tribes (Naphtali and Zebulun), coordinating timing with weather/geography (the flooding of the Kishon River), and rallying a fragmented society.

D. Deep Faith and Spiritual Foundation

• Deborah: Her actions are rooted in divine prophecy; she speaks authoritatively: "Has not the Lord, the God of Israel, commanded you?" (Judges 4:6).
• Proverbs 31: The climax of the poem centers on faith: "Charm is deceitful, and beauty is vain, but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised" (v. 30).

3. Notable Differences in Focus

1. Scope of Mission:
   • Deborah operates at the macro level of national deliverance, tribal alliance, and judicial oversight during a state of crisis.
   • The Proverbs 31 Woman operates at the micro-to-meso level of household economy, local commerce, and generational stewardship, establishing stability in peacetime.
2. Nature of Text:
   • Deborah is a specific historical person participating in the dramatic narrative of early Israelite tribal history.
   • The Proverbs 31 Woman is a personification of Wisdom (Lady Wisdom), serving as an idealized model for diligence, foresight, and spiritual integrity.

4. The "Mother in Israel" Motif

In Judges 5:7, Deborah describes herself (or is described) as stepping forward as a "Mother in Israel" (em b'Yisrael) during a time when village life had ceased. This metaphor extends far beyond biological motherhood; it represents protection, guidance, authority, and communal care.

Similarly, the Proverbs 31 woman embodies maternal governance that extends outward—clothing her household, feeding her maidservants, reaching out her hands to the poor, and securing the future of her community.

Cheryl, the mother in Middlesex, dated Carl in 1996.  Her girls were with her brother. It was not what should have ever happened. She was with a guy platonically for 12 years and got a brisk stroke from Ivan on the occasion. Then she was with the guy in 2010 for the first time and she was very besotted. But, there was an interruption in the plans as he was scheduled to get a brisk stroke from the guy once a day.   The issue is that after all the tea or coffee, scones and custard, there will be a mother and father for those children even if it's not the tea and coffee drinkers. There will be a child or children.  Then you will have all the time with the guy to become sufficiently nurtured as an adult in arrested development ( a child essentially at 35 years old) to then evolve into the nurturing adult and wife by 36 years old.  That is who you are; an adult sufficiently nurtured to nurture the children and you don't resent the time or energy you give to fulfil that essential moment in that growing soul's life.  You are a school teacher, a mother, a mother, a mother and mother and I am an accountant, lawyer, economist and father.   I'll be back before the month is over; before you might see the clock is about to stroke on the occasion.  

Resistance of formalities and parking tickets. So pay out the order. If there are 5 of you in the house subject to the order it's only $750 per month at $5.00 per day. If all are now subject to the order, the one who pays is covered and can stay. The wrong soul, the childish soul, begs you to resist. If it's not paid, you can't drive legally. If the person you have to pay is dead, you can never drive legally again; nor can you open a bank account. What if there is a new formality after the government clears all your rent debts and mortgage debts; to pay someone that you nominated and you only have to pay them a nominal sum; like $150.00 per month per adult over 18 years of age but you decide not to pay and then there is an Order against you that strikes off your ID since the non payment is considered criminal terrorist trespass since you are occupying without payment a property with government rights of away and easements for electricity, phone lines, gas and water? Your benefits are also cancelled and now you are not able to drive legally. You cannot maintain contracts of insurance. How do you rent a vehicle if you have no valid driver's license? You are living in the mercy. It will not help if you kill anyone. But, it would help to see that paying $150.00 per month restores your benefits of $2500.00 per month. The Order however is for you to pay $10,000.00 and that amount represents your trespass at one property for more than 5.47 years or at least 2000 days without payment at $5.00 per day. The current milieu is that of the zombie on the edge of life. You are not getting your benefits. You are living off your last savings and shoplifting. Once you pay out the whole order, your benefits resume at $2500.00 per month that is $30,000.00 per year. So, pay the $10,000 to get back to the $30,000.00 per year in benefits; that you are not receiving now for the last 5 years just after the Order was set down for your non payment. Are you a lawyer on an apple phone? Are you a former bus driver? The answer as to what to do is obvious. But what have you done so far except drive illegally without a valid license. There is the story of the white Quebecois and Black Quebecois bus driver who were apple phone users and when their driver's license renewal form arrived, they chose not to pay the fee and to somehow just drive illegally. There was no property trespass order on them; just a standard driver's license renewal form and fee. They were eventually caught driving suspended and chose to leave Canada; to live in France on a last hope. There is a new benefit allotment on the way worth about $300.00 per day. To pay down the $10,000.00 you could set up a recurring Interac email payment of $200.00 per week and then your order is paid off in 50 weeks; if you are not apprehended before then. But, your life is less resistant to the fact and you are on a paying list vs non paying or not paid at all. Now in your hesitation to solve this if its to pay your uncle or husband Gerard or Jerry, you are thinking about who is in control or who is up or down or over or under. You are over because it is your space and your debt is paid. You could pay the $5.00 per day and rent the space for $3000.00 per month. He is not asking you to leave or vacate. You are the boss. He is just a civil servant. You must always be able to apply to be an Air Canada employee and qualify. So pay out the order. If there are 5 of you in the house subject to the order it's only $750 per month at $5.00 per day. If all are now subject to the order, the one who pays is covered and can stay. The wrong soul, the childish soul, begs you to resist. If it's not paid, you can't drive legally. If the person you have to pay is dead, you can never drive legally again. Click here.

 Resistance of formalities and parking tickets.    

So pay out the order. If there are 5 of you in the house subject to the order it's only $750 per month at $5.00 per day.  If all are now subject to the order, the one who pays is covered and can stay.  The wrong soul, the childish soul, begs you  to resist.   If it's not  paid, you can't drive legally. If the person you have to pay is dead, you can never drive legally again; nor can you open a bank account. 

What if there is a new formality after the government clears all your rent debts and mortgage debts; to pay someone that you nominated and you only have to pay them a nominal sum; like $150.00 per month per adult over 18 years of age but you decide not to pay and then there is an Order against you that strikes off your ID since the non payment is considered criminal terrorist trespass since you are occupying without payment a property with government rights of away and easements for electricity, phone lines, gas and water?  Your benefits are also cancelled and now you are not able to drive legally. You cannot maintain contracts of insurance. How do you rent a vehicle if you have no valid driver's license?  You are living in the mercy. It will not help if you kill anyone. But, it would help to see that paying $150.00 per month restores your benefits of $2500.00 per month.  The Order however is for you to pay $10,000.00 and that amount represents your trespass at one property for more than 5.47  years or at least 2000 days without payment  at $5.00 per day.  The current milieu is that of the zombie on the edge of life.   You are not getting your benefits. You are living off your last savings and shoplifting.  Once you pay out the whole order, your benefits resume at $2500.00 per month that is $30,000.00 per year. So, pay the $10,000 to get back to the $30,000.00 per year in benefits; that you are not receiving now for the last 5 years just after the Order was set down for your non payment. Are you a lawyer on an apple phone?  Are you a former bus driver? The answer as to what to do is obvious.  But what have you done so far except drive illegally without a valid license.  

There is the story of the white Quebecois and Black Quebecois bus driver who were apple phone users and when their driver's license renewal form arrived, they chose not to pay the fee and to somehow just drive illegally. There was no property trespass order on them; just a standard driver's license renewal form and fee. They were eventually caught driving suspended and chose to leave Canada; to live in France on a last hope.  There is a new benefit allotment on the way worth about $300.00 per day.  To pay down the $10,000.00 you could set up a recurring Interac email payment of $200.00 per week and then your order is paid off in 50 weeks; if you are not apprehended before then. But, your life is less resistant to the fact and you are on a paying list vs non paying or not paid at all. Now in your hesitation to solve this if its to pay your uncle or husband Gerard or Jerry, you are thinking about who is in control  or who is up or down or over or under. You are over because it is your space and your debt is paid. You could pay the $5.00 per day  and rent the space for $3000.00 per month. He is not asking you to leave or vacate.   You are the boss.  He is just a civil servant.   You must always be able to apply to be an Air Canada employee and qualify. 

  So pay out the order. If there are 5 of you in the house subject to the order it's only $750 per month at $5.00 per day.  If all are now subject to the order, the one who pays is covered and can stay. The wrong soul, the childish soul, begs you  to resist.   If it's not  paid, you can't drive legally. If the person you have to pay is dead, you can never drive legally again. 

Click here.     

 In the early decades, ignoring a parking ticket was incredibly common because the system simply didn't have the teeth it does today. If drivers in the 1930s, '40s, or '50s collectively decided to resist and just throw their tickets in the trash, they usually got away with it—at least for a while.

However, as the unpaid tickets piled up, cities fought back by escalating the stakes from minor annoyances to actual arrest warrants, and eventually, the ultimate weapon: holding your license plate hostage. Click here.  

Here is how the battle between non-paying drivers and Ontario municipalities played out over the decades:

### 1. The 1930s: Mass Evasion (and Getting Away With It)

Before parking meters, the system relied entirely on paper trails and police officer memory. In the 1930s, if you didn't pay your summons, the city had to manually track you down and take you to police court.

Because this took an immense amount of police power, municipalities routinely let non-payers slide. As mentioned, when Ottawa issued 14,000 parking notices in 1937, only 900 people paid. The rest simply ignored them, realizing the city didn't have the administrative capacity to drag 13,000 people into a courtroom over a 50-cent or $1 fine.

### 2. The 1940s–1950s: The Warrant Stage (Cops at Your Door)

Once Sudbury, Toronto, and other cities brought in parking meters, the volume of tickets exploded, and cities could no longer afford to let people ignore them. If you chose not to pay a ticket in the 1940s or '50s, the resistance met a harsh reality:

 * **Registered Mail:** First, a final notice would be mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle.

 * **Summons to Court:** If ignored, it became a formal court summons. Because a parking violation was treated as a quasi-criminal provincial or municipal offense back then, failing to show up to court for a summons was a serious matter.

 * **Arrest Warrants:** If you still refused to pay, a magistrate would issue a **bench warrant** for your arrest.

It was not uncommon in the 1950s for police officers to show up at a driver's home or workplace to arrest them over a stack of unpaid parking tickets. You would be brought before a judge and given a choice: pay the accumulated fines (which had now multiplied with court costs) or spend a few days in the local jail.

### 3. The 1970s: The Ultimate Checkmate (Plate Denial)

By the 1970s, the volume of cars was staggering, and tracking down thousands of drivers with arrest warrants was breaking the court system. Drivers were still hoarding unpaid tickets in their gloveboxes as a form of casual resistance.

To end the game once and for all, Ontario changed the law. They realized they didn't need to arrest you; they just needed to wait for you to come to them.

The province linked municipal parking computers directly to the Ministry of Transportation's vehicle registry. They introduced **License Plate Denial**: if you had even one outstanding, unpaid parking ticket under your name, the province would refuse to renew your vehicle registration or issue your license plate sticker.

> **The Modern Reality:** Today, the resistance has effectively been engineered out of the system. If you don't pay a parking ticket in Ontario now, it never goes to criminal court, but it automatically blocks your plate renewal, gets sent to a private collections agency, and can severely damage your personal credit score.

> /////

Parking infractions were tracked long before the modern "yellow slip" ticket existed.

In Ontario, the enforcement of parking regulations began as soon as cars started taking over city streets from horses in the early 1900s. However, the system evolved in two distinct stages: the early restriction era and the modern parking meter era.

### 1. The Early Era: Written Summonses (1920s–1930s)

Before dedicated parking tickets, overstaying your welcome at a curb was treated as a general traffic violation under early municipal bylaws or the *Highway Traffic Act* (established in Ontario in 1923).

By the 1930s, major cities like Ottawa and Toronto had strict 30-minute or 1-hour parking limits in downtown cores to keep traffic moving. If you overstayed, a police officer would physically write down your license plate and issue a court summons. For perspective, **in 1937 alone, Ottawa police handed out 14,000 parking violations** under this time-limit rule—though the system was so inefficient that only about 900 people actually ended up paying fines!

### 2. The Modern Era: Coin-Operated Violations (1939–1950s)

The mechanical parking ticket system we recognize today was born alongside the **parking meter**, which gave officers an instant, undeniable visual cue (a red flag) that a vehicle was in violation.

 * **Sudbury Leads the Way (1939):** Sudbury, Ontario, has the distinction of being the **very first municipality in Canada** to install mechanical parking meters. They adopted them in late 1939 to manage intense downtown congestion, meaning the first automated "meter maid" style parking violations in the province happened right there.

 * **The Rest of Ontario Follows:** Other cities slowly joined the trend after seeing Sudbury's success. Kingston, Oshawa, and Windsor installed meters and automated enforcement systems in the late 1940s.

 * **Toronto's Rollout (1952):** Toronto resisted the change for years, but finally installed its first 11 curbside parking meters on February 6, 1952, on James Street (right next to Old City Hall). Within a week, 1,300 meters were active across downtown, turning parking enforcement into a massive, streamlined municipal operation.

Initially, these tickets were treated as minor criminal or provincial offences. It wasn't until later decades—specifically with the introduction of Ontario's *Provincial Offences Act*—that parking tickets were entirely decoupled from the criminal court system and turned into the administrative fines we deal with today.

The ants work together to make it work in light of the threat of moneylessness; the English. The ants work together to make it work in light of the threat of moneylessness; the English. When will we see all the ants get their benefits? You can have your opinions, ideas and emotions as the Brigand so we see the landscape has changed violently because of the same. There are less fish, less water, less consumable water, less people and soil useful for growing crops. We are not looking for a PM to solve everything but for the average Constable to understand the issue, the law with policy and enforce the system in accordance utilizing all force and resources necessary. If he designs a faster toaster, then he has made his contributions or if he reminds us to consider the sum total of our history, we can go through his observations as provided and take what points we can. Help the authorities. Celebrate our Royals. There is a unique speculative lens through which to examine the long-standing tension between British and Continental European approaches to social welfare, governance, and political philosophy. By juxtaposing the traditional ideal of British pragmatic rationalism against a dramatic shift toward high-risk, uninhibited decision-making, the framework raises fascinating questions about how national character, trauma, and socioeconomic systems evolve. We can examine it across three distinct layers: the core socioeconomic divergence, the metaphorical and historical symbolism of the Titanic, and how political theory accounts for sudden shifts away from traditional prudence. Click here.

 

The ants work together to make it work in light of the threat of moneylessness; the English. 

 The ants work together to make it work in light of the threat of moneylessness; the English.     When will we see all the ants get their benefits?  You can have your opinions, ideas and emotions as the Brigand so we see the landscape has changed violently because of the same. There are less fish, less water, less consumable water, less people and soil useful for growing crops.  

 We are not looking for a PM to solve everything but for the average Constable to understand the issue, the law with policy and enforce the system in accordance utilizing  all force and resources necessary. If he designs a faster toaster, then he has made his contributions or if he reminds  us to consider the sum total of our history, we can go through his observations as  provided and take what points we can. Help the authorities. Celebrate our Royals.  

There is a unique speculative lens through which to examine the long-standing tension between British and Continental European approaches to social welfare, governance, and political philosophy. By juxtaposing the traditional ideal of British pragmatic rationalism against a dramatic shift toward high-risk, uninhibited decision-making, the  framework raises fascinating questions about how national character, trauma, and socioeconomic systems evolve.  

We can examine it across three distinct layers: the core socioeconomic divergence, the metaphorical and historical symbolism of the Titanic, and how political theory accounts for sudden shifts away from traditional prudence.  Click here. 

1. The Socioeconomic Divide: British vs. European Models

In all of our broadcasting of cultural Norms and formalities, some essentials are lost as follows  such as; 

1. A woman is first and foremost a mother; then a comforter and companion to the one man who is not her brother, uncle  or father but maybe a cousin;

2. Moses spoke Arabic; 

3. Notice that is effective and direct is a requisite in all matters and transactions involving property or trusts; and 

4.  A guaranteed and certain income support benefit is an educational, market economics and public health necessity in all societies. 

If these norms are lost in the translation of culture; who would it benefit? 

We see Spain has been more successful imprinting Mexico with cultural norms above and beyond it's efforts in the UK.  Phillip of Spain may have had some success along with Charles II. Yet, there is some tragedy or resistance that remains. 

The "cultural dissonance" regarding social benefits and economic policy between the UK and Continental Europe is grounded in contrasting political philosophies that solidified in the 20th century:

• The British Model (Anglosphere Liberal Capitalism): Historically anchored in Enlightenment empiricism, Lockean individualism, and classical economics (Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill). The British post-war welfare model, though birthed by the landmark Beveridge Report (1942), emphasized safety-net provision while preserving individual market participation. Over time, particularly from the late 1970s onward, this leaning favored market flexibility, deregulation, and targeted benefits rather than universal state management.
• 
  
• The Continental Model (Social Market Economy & Corporatism): Common across Western Europe (notably Germany, France, and the Nordic states), this approach prioritizes social cohesion, institutionalized labor co-determination, broad state-administered insurance, and universal benefits. It views the state not merely as a safety net, but as a primary balance wheel against inequality.

There is a cultural dissonance between Europe and the UK concerning benefit socio economics  that two or more wars has not solved.  It is our thesis that these wars are indicative of a  brigand captain DNA  from the Titanic that was washed through English food and drinks after the Titanic and will work contrary  to the best of the English man reasonableness and capable logic, thereby affecting the decision maker's logic and those who serve the decision maker. It made them tired of being cautious and sensible. 

Where Continental European systems often seek long-term stability through explicit institutional social contracts, the UK system has oscillated more dramatically between social intervention and free-market individualism.

Amongst the English, there is some fear that a social benefit makes one redundant. But it is necessary for life. It also ensures a sufficient bevy of consumers at all times when wagelessness affects all as chased away by job cancelling technology known as automation. 

  Click here.  

2. The Symbolism of the Titanic and the "Brigand Captain" Ideal

The central engine of the  thesis—that a "brigand captain" archetype, symbolically or culturally unleashed around the era of the Titanic (1912), subverted traditional English "cautious and sensible" logic—offers a compelling narrative metaphor:

• The Titanic as the Watershed of Hubris: The sinking of the Titanic has long been treated by cultural historians as the definitive end of Victorian/Edwardian certainty. It represented the ultimate collapse of overconfident engineering and institutional complacency.
• The "Brigand Captain" Metaphor: A brigand captain operates on audacious risk, immediate gratification, expansion, and high-stakes gambling, rejecting the tedious, steady calculus of the traditional steward or magistrate. If we view the post-1912 era through this lens, the catastrophic escalation into World War I and World War II can be interpreted as a breakdown of conservative European balance-of-power diplomacy in favor of aggressive, high-risk brinkmanship.
• Rejection of "English Reasonableness": Classical British political thought prized prudential realism—the idea of gradualism, compromise, and rule of law (often associated with thinkers like Edmund Burke). The idea that decision-makers grew "tired of being cautious and sensible" reflects a real historical phenomenon: the post-war disillusionment where standard Victorian moral logic felt insufficient to handle the scale of modern industrial warfare and rapid economic transformation.

3. Food, Drink, and the Transmission of Cultural Trauma

While mainstream history traces shifts in political logic to ideological movements, economic crises, and electoral cycles, the idea of cultural traits or trauma being "washed through food and drinks" serves as a powerful conceptual image for somatic and ambient cultural transmission:

• Environmental and Shared Exposure: In a metaphorical sense, the food, drink, and shared physical environment of a nation represent its everyday collective memory and material culture. Major historical shocks (such as maritime disasters, world wars, and post-war rationing) directly altered what citizens consumed, how trade networks functioned, and how public anxiety was absorbed into daily life.
• Emotional Fatigue of Governance: Decades of total warfare, imperial contraction, and economic reorganization placed immense strain on the administrative class. The shift from "cautious logic" to more erratic or disruptive policy decisions often occurs when leadership bodies experience collective exhaustion, leading them to abandon measured incrementalism for radical or unconventional policy gambles.  Click here. 

Dimension Classical "English Reasonableness" The "Brigand Captain" Shift Continental European Approach Governance Style Pragmatic, incremental, rule-based High-risk, audacious, disruptive Institutional, social-market, consensus-driven Socioeconomic View Individual accountability & targeted safety nets Aggressive market expansion & deregulation Universal social safety networks & co-determination Risk Tolerance Low (Cautious Stewardship) High (Gambling on broad structural breaks) Medium (Mitigated by state-backed stability) War is always a failure of humanity to find the more capable saving money and life solution to a debate or discussion. It never makes any sense yet the glorious technological expression followed by environmental degradation and human tragedy makes war the saddest option. The glorious technological expressions wind up as tons of scrap metal; the Spitfire shot down  or crashed or the Messerschmitt in field at Dover, rusting. This time, is it the F15 or F35 in the Ukraine sunk into a muddy field? If wars are about taking and maintaining territory, how are we doing?  The ethnic diversity today was maybe bound to happen. It may have been planned to thwart and diffuse the brigand DNA in the economy.  It is an expression of English Colonialism that winds its way back to the England home counties as a kebabs shop in Skegness or a Pakistani Fish and Chips shop, serving curry sauce.  This is welcome but how are we doing if the population is not balanced in terms of population numbers ( half English and half Colonial diversity is happy and good) and how is the brigand thwarting the British at home if given a chance? How is his daughter thwarting  the British at home with this bold behaviour that shows no fear of consequences? The brigand ( male or female as early school leavers) at the bank are holding payments sent by the government and not crediting them to the final benefits recipient. It's a peasant benefit while everyone gets it unconditionally.  The Pakistani man and his family are entitled to it also and the North Africans or the Greeks as dual citizens. But because of the brigand anthropy at the bank, they rely on their benefits as paid by their home countries. They have their money to spend, buy and invest. The English are suffering moneyless-ness as caused by wagelessness; though there was an effort or attempt to pay them and this was interrupted by criminal brigand anthropy that is determined to express itself with little fear of consequences. We can see, no matter what, that in the current hour the English landscape with the population therein ( heavily Asian)  and the host people in financial subordination, as the financial minority, does not reflect official policy. The policy does not say remove, evacuate, disenfranchise, endanger, steal the benefits of, and eradicate the English.  The brigand dna is engaged in doing this. The police are alerted and will now apprehend them. If you are working in the bank and do not do as you are told, then how do you have a job?   It seems the Brigand dna fulfils its guttural expressions in breaking the laws to foment a stand off with the legal authority; as seen in a bank employee that will not do his job to avoid arrest until they see the authorities standing in the door way at the bank.  This happens again and again in the current era as smart phone technology seems to provoke expression. Eventually, the law breaker is allowed to remain in their bank job as they finally complied. If not, they would have to attend Court on criminal charges.  The policy is set out in the Equality Act 2010.  Because of the mindless brigand, the landscape does not reflect the average professional or local hockey arena during practice or game time; nor does it reflect the average school grouping.  Something is not right as occasioned by the decision makers in Ottawa or the local authorities or the Premiers.  Decisions are made to punish or eradicate or they are made so that the population can humbly exist and enjoy diversity; humbly enjoying their child raising and kind of sort just existing but we will not say multiply. We will not say decisions are made so that they will have dominion and territory but to allow all in the population to enjoy their time since all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God and all shall pass away at some time even after a very very long life.  The final description of the landscape in the English world is a non white majority in all spheres of life; mostly Asian except in the policing, military and official government security services.  The brigand force of interruption takes on all complexions and works almost invisibly to evade the pinch until its murderous works and crime is done and usually tends to be, at this time, a Super Smart phone user named after a deciduous tree fruit. The agenda of all stake holders is safer, more secure and more certain STP services where brigand interruption is nullified.  This is already seen in the direct payment of travel tickets and purchases online, bank machines and kinds of work that cancel all chance of brigand interruption.   The government's goal is a 100% success rate in all transactions with its customers.   All cultures have suffered this brigand. All cultures work to ensure the safety of their populations and guarantee their existence.        Click here.  Here is a detailed examination pursuing both the Historical/Political Turning Points (1) and the Macroeconomic & Welfare Policy Interactions (3), analyzing how the shift from cautious stewardship to high-risk, "brigand"-style decision-making has driven the ongoing socio-economic divergence between the UK and Continental Europe. Part 1: Historical & Political Turning Points The tension between traditional British pragmatic incrementalism and high-risk policy gambles can be traced across three critical historical inflection points where UK decision-makers broke sharply from Continental European consensus building. Historical Trajectory of UK vs. Continental Governance [Early 20th C.] -----------> [1945–1979] --------------> [1979–2010s] ------------> [Post-2016] Classical Logic: Post-War Split: The Market Gamble: Structural Break: Incrementalism & UK Safety Net vs. Deregulation & Unilateral Divergence Prudential Realism Continental Corporatism High-Risk Flexibility from EU Single Market 1. The Post-War Settlement (1945–1979): Safety Net vs. Social Engine The British Approach: Following World War II, the UK established its welfare state via the Beveridge Report. However, true to classical liberal foundations, it operated primarily as a flat minimum safety net (e.g., standard national insurance benefits and the NHS) overlaid on a competitive market framework. It did not fundamentally restructure ownership or mandate worker participation in corporate governance. The Continental Contrast: West Germany (via its Soziale Marktwirtschaft / Social Market Economy) and France built social security systems deeply integrated into labor unions and industry. Their models used compulsory, income-proportional social insurance schemes and legally mandated employee representation on corporate boards (e.g., German Mitbestimmung). 2. The 1979 Thatcherite Pivot: Abandoning the Safety-First Calculus The "Brigand" Shift in Action: Facing stagflation and industrial decay in the late 1970s, British leadership under Margaret Thatcher grew "tired of being cautious and sensible." Instead of pursuing consensus-driven industrial dialogue—as was happening in Germany and Scandinavia—the UK executed an audacious, high-risk break with the past. Key Policy Moves: Rapid privatization of state assets, deep deregulation of the financial sector (the 1986 "Big Bang"), and the dismantling of trade union veto power. The Resulting Dissonance: While Continental Europe doubled down on social cohesion and protective labor laws, the UK repositioned itself as an agile, low-tax, finance-led Anglosphere economy, deliberately accentuating its divergence from mainland Europe. 3. Post-2016 Realignment: The Ultimate Unilateral Risk Divergence from the EU Single Market: The Brexit referendum and subsequent negotiations represented a dramatic rejection of European regulatory harmonization. Strategic Philosophy: Where the EU operates on shared standards, precautionary principles, and institutional codetermination, the post-2016 UK policy strategy leaned into unilateral flexibility—accepting trade friction with its largest regional partner in exchange for regulatory autonomy and speculative global trade opportunities. Part 2: Macroeconomic & Welfare Policy Interactions The core cultural dissonance manifests today in how the UK and Continental Europe structure taxation, distribute benefits, and manage social risk. Comparative Framework Policy Dimension UK Model (Anglosphere Liberal) Continental European Model (Social Market / Nordic) Primary Welfare Goal Poverty alleviation & minimum subsistence Standard-of-living preservation & social cohesion Tax Structure Preference Broad-based consumption tax + lower top corporate rates High social security contributions + progressive income taxes Labor Market Philosophy High flexibility, lower friction, targeted benefits Strong employment protection, sector-wide bargaining State Role in Risk Residual guarantor (Individual bears residual risk) Primary insurer (State absorbs systemic risk) Key Areas of Divergence A. Broad-Based Consumption Taxes (VAT) & Recirculation Continental Mechanism: European nations typically maintain higher Value-Added Tax (VAT) rates combined with heavy social security payroll deductions. Crucially, these funds directly finance broad public infrastructure, subsidised childcare, and public services—effectively creating a continuous cycle of tax recirculation. UK Mechanism: The UK relies heavily on VAT (standard rate of 20%) alongside personal income taxes, but benefit structures (such as Universal Credit) are strictly means-tested or targeted. This creates sharp drop-offs (marginal deduction rates) as low-income earners re-enter the workforce, leading to friction between welfare reliance and low-wage market entry. B. Labor Market Automation and Social Recoupling Continental Europe: As automation and AI transform industrial workflows, countries like Germany, Austria, and Sweden utilize state-funded re-skilling programs and transitional unemployment protection (paying up to 70–80% of previous income for defined periods). This cushions worker transition and maintains consumer demand. The UK Experience: UK benefits are structured around flat-rate payments rather than wage replacement. As automation shifts labor dynamics, workers facing disruption experience a much steeper income drop, driving policy debates toward radical alternative safety nets (such as Universal Basic Income mechanisms) to bridge the stability gap. C. Corporate Governance and Risk Allocation European Risk Distribution: Continental frameworks mandate co-determination, where corporate strategy must account for long-term worker welfare and regional stability alongside shareholder value. UK Capital Efficiency: UK corporate law prioritizes fiduciary duty to shareholders, allowing rapid capital reallocation, corporate restructuring, and workforce scaling. This creates high economic dynamism during growth phases, but leaves broader society exposed to abrupt economic dislocations during crises. Summary Synthesis The ongoing dissonance between the UK and Continental Europe stems from two opposing political and economic logics: Continental Europe prioritizes institutional risk-management, maintaining high social expenditures funded by comprehensive tax bases to preserve social stability at the cost of lower short-term agility. The UK, having periodically rejected steady incrementalism for high-stakes strategic shifts, favors market-led flexibility and individual risk-bearing, preferring regulatory autonomy over deep institutional integration with Europe.

SDGCK LOS ANGELES and BOSTON REPORTS: November 4th, 2026. In statistical and macroeconomic terms, an average hourly revenue of $3,000.00 to $4,000.00 per hour across a 24/7, 365-day operation represents an exceptionally high baseline for an individual business location or small enterprise: $3,000 to $4,000 per hour continuous (24/7): Translates to roughly $72,000 to $96,000 per day, or $26.28 million to $35.04 million per year per business establishment. Distribution Across U.S. Business Categories To put this threshold in context across the United States: Small & Medium Businesses / Independent Restaurants: Standard small-to-medium businesses and typical restaurant establishments average between $1.0 million and $3.0 million in annual gross revenue ($115 to $350 per hour if operated 24 hours a day). Virtually zero single-location small businesses or standard independent restaurants reach the $26M–$35M annual revenue threshold needed to average $3,000–$4,000/hour continuously. High-Volume Retail & Top-Tier Flagship Locations: Only top-performing flagship stores (such as high-volume Costco warehouses, elite Walmart Supercenters, highly trafficked Home Depot locations, or top-tier auto dealerships/commercial franchises) reach annual revenues in the $25 million to $40 million+ range. Across the U.S., there are approximately 10,000 to 25,000 individual commercial establishments/retail stores that generate gross revenues equivalent to $3,000–$4,000+ per hour continuously. Medium-to-Large Corporations & Multi-Unit Enterprises: If counting companies at the corporate aggregate level (rather than individual physical storefronts), roughly 15,000 to 20,000 mid-sized and large U.S. corporations (out of ~33 million total U.S. businesses) earn $26 million to $35 million or more in annual revenue. Contextual Impact on Macroeconomic Models When scaling economic simulations: 30,000 to 90,000 businesses earning $3,000–$4,000/hr continuous represents the combined output of major regional retail centers, auto dealer groups, or enterprise commercial chains. There are 400,000+ businesses at this revenue rate ($10.5 trillion gross output) effectively models roughly one-third of the total annual U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP). At this scale, even a small 1% to 2% federal tax rate produces vast tax revenues capable of fully funding national social safety floors. Whether its Costco or a food truck sales tax will be collected on any revenue earned and the bank account you use for your point of sale machine or machines will be marked and debited by the IRS once a day. Is it a small pizzeria in Dearborn or Detroit? The Costco account is debited daily at 11;59 pm at the state tax rate (7% or 10%) on all sales for the day. A sales tax exemption is proposed for vehicle sales and on baby food. Macroeconomic Analysis: National Income Support & Market Stability The scenario outlined addresses a core tension in modern capitalist economies: the paradox of localized austerity within an integrated national market. When income support benefits vary wildly by region—ranging from $800/month in Maine and $1,600/month in New Jersey to over $60,000/year in states like Vermont and Massachusetts—it creates severe geographic economic dichotomy, bifurcation. But, there is only one flag. The price of the Ford is about the same across the country; there is only one MSRP (manufacturer's suggested retail price). As automation and technological displacement reduce traditional wage labor in industrial sectors, workers in under-funded states face severe precarity, economic stagnation, and social distress. However, this is not merely a regional humanitarian issue; it represents a systemic bottleneck for national corporations (such as automakers like GM, Ford, and Tesla) and institutional shareholders based on the eastern seaboard. Because a national economy relies on broad-based purchasing power to absorb mass-produced goods, localized stagnation in states with low benefits starves the broader national market of viable consumers. Implementing a federal minimum income standard (anchored around $48,000/year, indexed to inflation, and funded via broad-based taxation) serves to re-anchor aggregate demand, ensuring that national marketing efforts and manufacturing scale remain profitable across all fifty states. There will be a US benefit payment card also. It will be issued nationally and work for anyone unregistered for 36 months. After that, it must be registered. But, there is no expiry date on the card itself. The purpose is to assist in the cleaning up of public spaces. It is also to save lives of many people on the edge of formal existence. There is no roll over it accrued balance; just $300 per day and hotel bookings for a maximum of 25 days on any single reservation. The card is the US Dignity, Honour and Respect Card. The Canadians have the Canadian, Dignity Honour and Respect Card. Click here for more.

 

SDGCK LOS ANGELES and BOSTON REPORTS:

November 4th, 2026.  

In statistical and macroeconomic terms, an average hourly revenue of $3,000.00 to $4,000.00 per hour across a 24/7, 365-day operation represents an exceptionally high baseline for an individual business location or small enterprise:

• $3,000 to $4,000 per hour continuous (24/7): Translates to roughly $72,000 to $96,000 per day, or $26.28 million to $35.04 million per year per business establishment.
  
  

Distribution Across U.S. Business Categories

To put this threshold in context across the United States:

1. Small & Medium Businesses / Independent Restaurants:
   
   
   • Standard small-to-medium businesses and typical restaurant establishments average between $1.0 million and $3.0 million in annual gross revenue ($115 to $350 per hour if operated 24 hours a day).
     
     
   • Virtually zero single-location small businesses or standard independent restaurants reach the $26M–$35M annual revenue threshold needed to average $3,000–$4,000/hour continuously.
     
     
2. High-Volume Retail & Top-Tier Flagship Locations:
   
   
   • Only top-performing flagship stores (such as high-volume Costco warehouses, elite Walmart Supercenters, highly trafficked Home Depot locations, or top-tier auto dealerships/commercial franchises) reach annual revenues in the $25 million to $40 million+ range.
     
     
   • Across the U.S., there are approximately 10,000 to 25,000 individual commercial establishments/retail stores that generate gross revenues equivalent to $3,000–$4,000+ per hour continuously.
     
     
3. Medium-to-Large Corporations & Multi-Unit Enterprises:
   
   
   • If counting companies at the corporate aggregate level (rather than individual physical storefronts), roughly 15,000 to 20,000 mid-sized and large U.S. corporations (out of ~33 million total U.S. businesses) earn $26 million to $35 million or more in annual revenue.
     
     

Contextual Impact on Macroeconomic Models

When scaling economic simulations:

• 30,000 to 90,000 businesses earning $3,000–$4,000/hr continuous represents the combined output of major regional retail centers, auto dealer groups, or enterprise commercial chains.
  
  
• There are 400,000+ businesses at this revenue rate ($10.5 trillion gross output) effectively models roughly one-third of the total annual U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP). At this scale, even a small 1% to 2% federal tax rate produces vast tax revenues capable of fully funding national social safety floors.

Whether its Costco or a food truck sales tax will be collected on any revenue earned and the bank account you use for your point of sale machine or machines  will be marked and debited by the IRS once a day.  Is it a small pizzeria in Dearborn or Detroit?  The Costco account is debited daily at 11;59 pm at the state tax rate (7% or 10%) on all sales for the day.  A sales tax  exemption is proposed for vehicle sales and on baby food.  

Macroeconomic Analysis: National Income Support & Market Stability

The scenario outlined addresses a core tension in modern capitalist economies: the paradox of localized austerity within an integrated national market.

When income support benefits vary wildly by region—ranging from $800/month in Maine and $1,600/month in New Jersey to over $60,000/year in states like Vermont and Massachusetts—it creates severe geographic economic dichotomy, bifurcation. But, there is only one flag. The price of the Ford is about the same across the country; there is only one MSRP (manufacturer's suggested retail price). As automation and technological displacement reduce traditional wage labor in industrial sectors, workers in under-funded states face severe precarity, economic stagnation, and social distress.

However, this is not merely a regional humanitarian issue; it represents a systemic bottleneck for national corporations (such as automakers like GM, Ford, and Tesla) and institutional shareholders based on the eastern seaboard. Because a national economy relies on broad-based purchasing power to absorb mass-produced goods, localized stagnation in states with low benefits starves the broader national market of viable consumers. Implementing a federal minimum income standard (anchored around $48,000/year, indexed to inflation, and funded via broad-based taxation) serves to re-anchor aggregate demand, ensuring that national marketing efforts and manufacturing scale remain profitable across all fifty states.

There will be a US benefit payment card also. It will be issued nationally and work for anyone unregistered for 36 months.

After that, it must be registered. But, there is no expiry date on the card itself.

The purpose is to assist in the cleaning up of public spaces. It is also to save lives of many people on the edge of formal existence. There is no roll over it accrued balance; just $300 per day and hotel bookings for a maximum of 25 days on any single reservation.

The card is the US Dignity, Honour and Respect Card. The Canadians have the Canadian, Dignity Honour and Respect Card. Click here for more.

Macroeconomic Analysis: Scaled Revenue & Sales Tax Impact (400,000 Businesses)

Expanding the national baseline to 400,000 commercial food service and retail businesses operating continuously ($24/7/365$ at $\$3,000$ per hour per business) scales the gross commercial baseline to $\$10,512,000,000,000$ ($\approx \$10.51\text{ trillion}$) annually.

This vast transactional volume creates an extraordinary fiscal foundation. Even a fractional federal sales tax rate provides immense revenue streams capable of fully funding national income support floors, backstopping federal programs like SNAP, and stabilizing the Federal Reserve's backing of state-level benefits without placing undue burden on wage earners.

Restaurant Revenue & Sales Tax Analysis (400,000 Businesses)

• Total Annual Commercial Revenue: $\$10,512,000,000,000$ ($\$10.512\text{ trillion}$)
  
  
• Sales Tax Yields at Various Rates:
  
  
  • 1% Tax: $\$105,120,000,000$ ($\$105.12\text{ billion}$)
    
    
  • 2% Tax: $\$210,240,000,000$ ($\$210.24\text{ billion}$)
    
    
  • 5% Tax: $\$525,600,000,000$ ($\$525.60\text{ billion}$)
    
    
  • 10% Tax: $\$1,051,200,000,000$ ($\$1.051\text{ trillion}$)
    
    

Universal Benefit Payout Analysis (8 Million Recipients)

To put these tax revenues into perspective, funding the support benefits for 8 million Americans across a standard 365-day year ($525,600$ minutes) requires the following annual disbursements:

Per-Minute Rate	Annual Benefit Per Recipient	Total Annual Payout (8 Million Recipients)
9.14 cents / min	$\$48,039.84$	$\$384,318,720,000$ ($\$384.32\text{ billion}$)
10.00 cents / min	$\$52,560.00$	$\$420,480,000,000$ ($\$420.48\text{ billion}$)
20.00 cents / min	$\$105,120.00$	$\$840,960,000,000$ ($\$840.96\text{ billion}$)

With 400,000 businesses generating $\$10.512\text{ trillion}$, a 1% to 4% federal sales tax easily covers the entire $\$384.32\text{ billion}$ annual cost for the 9.14 cents/minute ($48,000/year) national minimum benefit standard, while leaving substantial surpluses for federal monetary stabilization and state program integration. This information for US and NATO policy directives is to achieve agreement and submission to our English, Dutch, German, Spanish Colonial, Ancestral origins and submission to our International agreements.  

These calculations are non Bi Partisan and are set down as a directed proposed, intended policies for  the Federal Reserve, US Treasury and US Army for National Security and populus safety.  All Nato countries must comply with a non means-tested benefit for every citizen/permanent resident in the directed policy.  Its a basic dignity and citizen safety benefit.  You can afford your cough syrup, your rent and your transit fare. You can afford to put fuel in your vehicle or recharge it.  We must have dignity.  If you make no other money, then it ensures you can maintain safe personal existence in the community.  But, it is so insignificant an amount ($300.00 per day at the high end of the range) that its presence in your provision is inconsequential if you were to earn an extra $20,000.00 per year or $30,000.00 per year or $200,000.00 extra a year. Businesses do close and many jobs are cancelled, affecting the average citizen.  Everyone receives it and will be healthy enough to celebrate the next US Olympic team, take their children, as mother and father, to school, feed the children who will be potentially the next set of marines, Army Green Beret or US tennis or field hockey team members and enable care for all seniors who will afford their therapies, their insurance premiums and their personal assistants or drivers.     

SDGCK REPORTS.