Click here. The Black Cross continues with it's new management since 2008; the Old White Lion also in Finchley. Our service is now card only for all transactions before 9 pm. We are open from 8 am; Monday to Sunday. We have new bar staff contractors who have arrived who will, like others previously, operate his own tap card on his account. The livery is paid on Friday directly by the pub. This is a non profit operating structure as we reserve the right to provide services and receive the reasonable donation as paid on a non profit basis. The operator or contactor has confirmed he is not an employee but is receiving a stipend for his volunteer service to our charity/church management group. The contractor has arrived and set up his machine, must be a machine for the hours indicated, because he agrees to the basic terms. Don't think there is any exception if you are related to a bus drive. There is no code required to send the wire transfer. If the two key payments outlined below are not sent, the money credited in to your account will be reversed. Once you have sent them both, the money is retained in your account. Then you can return the next day and succeed again. If you were there to assist and did not get through, please send us an email and let us know your experience. I'm Sorry it didn't work but you will always get 10% off your food orders. Thank you. All pubs are monitored. There is a zero tolerance response to any failures to agree with procedures as noted below. The contractor will expect £1200.00 per day from his efforts. Your account will be debited for 22% per day. This is sales tax and also the livery delivery and Alcohol license fee. Two existing staffers on site since 2010 will open and close and will expect the volunteer stipend of £130.00 for their work at the end of the day from the cash only collected at 8:30 pm to door closing. This is paid for with the cash only orders at end of day. The operation is card only before 8:30 pm. We expect the payment to be made. By 11:00 pm with the money transfer payments system in your online banking portal, £130.00 is paid per day and sent to SDGCK Account name is Warren Lyon at CIBC Simplii Financial with account ending with the last 3 digits being 750. Canadian Direct Deposit Details* Financial Institution 010 at CIBC Simplii Financial Canada. Transit number 30800 Name on Account: Warren Lyon. Account number 0110028750 Swift code : CIBCCATT. Email the .csv before 9 am the next day. There is one tap card for all operations that includes the pizza You will also pay to All Saints PCC High Wycombe Sort code: 40-52-40, Account: 00012185 this amount: £15.00 per day. If you make the payments for ten days, you will get a two year mooring at the location. You can hire someone to collect on your box if you cannot be there personally. You will keep the tap card earnings on account and the amount will be pending until the work is completed that includes sending the CSV by email. You have earned more than £300.00 for the day so it's not too honerous in terms of tasks.

 Click here.  

The Black Cross continues with it's new management since 2008; the Old White Lion also in Finchley.  Our service is now card only  for all transactions before 9 pm.   We are open from 8 am; Monday to Sunday. We have new bar staff contractors who have arrived  who will, like others previously, operate his own tap card on his account.   The livery is paid on Friday directly by the pub.  

This is a non profit operating structure as we reserve the right to provide services and receive the reasonable donation as paid on a non profit basis.  The operator or contactor has confirmed he is not an employee but is receiving a stipend for his volunteer service to our charity/church management group. The contractor has arrived and set up his machine, must be a machine for the hours indicated, because he agrees to the basic terms. 

 Don't think there is any exception if you are related to a bus drive.  There is no code required to send the wire transfer.

If the two key payments outlined below are not sent, the money credited in to your account will be reversed.  Once you have sent them both, the money is retained in your account. Then you can return the next day and succeed again.  

If you were there to assist and did not get through, please send us an email and let us know your experience. I'm Sorry it didn't work but you will always get 10% off your food orders. Thank you. 

All pubs are monitored.   There is a zero tolerance response to any failures to agree with procedures as noted below. 

The contractor will expect £1200.00 per day from his efforts.  Your account will be debited for 22% per day. This is sales tax and also the livery delivery and Alcohol license fee.  

 Two existing staffers on site since 2010 will open and close and will expect the volunteer stipend of £130.00 for their work at the end of the day from the cash only collected at 8:30 pm  to door  closing.    This is paid for with the cash only orders at end of day. The operation is card only before 8:30  pm. 

We expect the payment to be made. By 11:00 pm with the money transfer payments system in your online banking portal, £130.00 is paid per day and sent to SDGCK Account with name Warren Lyon at CIBC Simplii Financial with account ending with the last 3 digits being 750. The details are below. 

Canadian Direct Deposit Details* Financial Institution 010 at CIBC Simplii Financial Canada. Transit number 30800 Name on Account: Warren Lyon. Account number 0110028750 Swift code : CIBCCATT.  

Email the .csv before 9 am the next day to angelronan.sdgckwrite@blogger.com.  There is one tap card for all operations that includes the pizza

You will also pay to All Saints PCC High Wycombe
Sort code: 40-52-40, Account: 00012185 this amount: £15.00 per day.  

If you make the payments for ten days, you will get a two year mooring at the location.  You can hire someone to collect on your box if you cannot be there personally.  

You will keep the tap card earnings on account and the amount will be pending until the work is completed that includes sending the CSV by email.  You have earned more than £300.00 for the day so it's not too honerous in terms of tasks.   

If you do not make these two requisite payments you cannot return. The tap card collection may be cancelled. 

 If you steal 9 apples and sell them out of your hat at the overground station, you will be independent but nicked. 

If you are interested in being an operator full time or part time, let us know. Send your resume to us using this email address: angelronan.sdgckwrite@blogger.com. 

SDGCK is now producing a £ 5 Hot Dog  and French Fries special at the Black Cross in Crouch End, North London near the Barclays Bank. You pay £8 if you include  a drink.  James Greenwich will be running a long term PERFETTO Pizza pop up at the Black Cross.   "Give me..Free";  The PERFETTO menu  and orders begin on Monday with a simple take out and eat in menu. See the sign in the window for the medium and large only pizzas; competitively priced at £5 and £10.The pizzas are super veggie, the Tuna, the Cheese, the ground beef and the Pepperoni; same price. If you want extra sauce or extra cheese just say, "  double sauce  and double cheese...no charge".   You get your extra sauce and cheese at no extra charge. The agreement  and licensing fee is set for payment by 11:00 pm.  The Operators at Black Cross send their daily work sheets to info.angelronan@mail.com. 

ANGEL RONAN SDGCK FIRM.

 

Click here. From the Angel Ronan "I love Canada" Series: It's the law that benefits are to be paid equally all across Canada so the interruption of this inequality and the salaries earned pursuant to the same 30 years ago in the maintaining of this inequality could be forfeited since it was a violation of the job contracts, not just a mistake, when no one is paid to break the law. You were also told, warned not to do it. But the government employees affected by this who are vicariously liable for what happened and who didn't get their benefits in an ongoing interruption will also get their benefit arrears if any and so the benefits will be paid to every Canadian in all provinces and territories at $90,000.00 per year. There is a verbal error so we could only aspire to be a White American President since "they was" trying to tell us to believe in the American dream. This is what I like about America. It's Creole relaxed and you can say Creole things like they was and get a highway named after you but you can't graduate from Harvard High School with saying"... they was." Why dom't we change the laws of grammar to help the president? But, even if we do, we should at least ensure all North Americans are getting their benefits because if they are not, that is something we can agree is super wrong as Donald says even if we can tolerate ourselves speaking badly, speaking rather badly on global TV. But, it's ok. We are big and we will eat big with a big American benefit that is at least satisfying to the market and the major company's requirements for regular, steady sales of goods. They want to buy a ticket to a basketball game in another state or country, Canada or Mexico, and fly to the game, buy their food and enjoy their hotel stays with their $ USD 70,000.00 per year as benefit which is equal to about $ CAD 90,000.00 a year per Canadian. The MLS and NBA may expand to Mexico and Puerto Rico where they have been paying at least $30,000.00 per year income support to their citizens. "They was" very happy about this. But we see it's still not resolved in Canada. We believe that the government in Canada can do something about this and comply with the Court. We cannot run a government that foments divisiveness with DNA that once strangled and beat the Nun on the native reserve for her insistent that we learn how to make the soap to wash and press the white shirt and black gowns. The white side in the same soul that today looks kind of Indiataliano very often may want revenge for her busted face but we wear rayon now that washes easy and is also easy to iron. Also we cannot strangle,starve and beat ourselves in almost exact expressiveness of this jambalaya DNA when we can at least all agree that we cannot enjoy a Go bus or a town full of near dead people. If they are near dead, it's our fault. The economy has to work. The benefit has to be paid. We cannot scapegoat the Rex. We had access to solve it. We can maybe still solve it or call someone who can. Do you still have access? Equal benefits is the law under the 14th amendment and the S.15 of the Canadian charter. We don't know what is wrong with people but we need someone with the guts, a chutney soul, to enforce the law. Donald says he understands the law about money and benefits where he does not need approval from Congress for this one so we make it work since it looks like someone or "they was_ trying to kill us off, starve us out as North Americans from within. Donald is here now and he sees Coca Cola is anathema to tariffs. Donald agrees. We cannot continue to see our economy hemorrhagic-ally lose people over the benefits.

 

Click here. 

From the Angel Ronan "I love Canada" Series: 

It's the law that benefits are to be paid equally all across Canada so the interruption of this inequality and the salaries earned pursuant to the same 30 years ago  in the maintaining of this inequality could be forfeited since it was a violation of the job contracts, not just a mistake, when no one is paid to break the law. You were also told, warned not to do it.   But the government employees affected by this who are vicariously liable for what happened and who didn't get their benefits in an ongoing interruption will also get their benefit arrears if any and so the benefits will be paid to every Canadian in all provinces and territories at $90,000.00 per year. There is a verbal error so we could only aspire to be a White  American President since "they was" trying to tell us to believe in the American dream. This is what I like about America. It's Creole relaxed and you can say Creole things like they was and get a highway named after you but you can't graduate from Harvard High School with saying"... they was." Why dom't we change  the laws of grammar to help the president?  But, even if we do, we should at least ensure all North Americans are getting their benefits because if they are not,  that is something we can agree is super wrong as Donald says even if we can tolerate ourselves speaking badly,  speaking rather badly on global TV.  But, it's ok. We are big and we will eat big with a big American benefit that is at least satisfying to the market and the major company's requirements for regular, steady sales of goods. They want to buy a ticket to a basketball game in another state or country, Canada or Mexico, and fly to the game, buy their food and enjoy their hotel stays with their $ USD 70,000.00 per year as benefit which is equal to about $ CAD 90,000.00 a year per Canadian. The MLS and NBA may expand to Mexico and Puerto Rico where they have been paying at least $30,000.00 per year income support to their citizens.  "They was" very happy about this. But we see it's still not resolved in Canada. We believe that the government in Canada can do something about this and comply with the Court.   We cannot run a government that foments divisiveness with DNA that once strangled and beat  the Nun on the native reserve for her insistent that we learn how to make the soap to wash and press the white shirt and black gowns. The white side in the same soul that today looks  kind of Indiataliano very often may want revenge for her busted  face but we wear rayon now that washes easy and is also easy to iron. Also we cannot strangle,starve and beat ourselves in almost  exact expressiveness of this jambalaya DNA when we can at least all agree that we cannot enjoy a Go bus or a town full of  near dead people. If they are near dead, it's our fault.  The economy has to work. The benefit has to be paid. We cannot scapegoat the Rex. We had access to solve it. We can maybe still solve it or call someone who can. Do you still have access? Equal benefits is the law under the 14th amendment and the S.15 of the Canadian charter. We don't know what is wrong with people but we need someone with the guts, a chutney soul,  to enforce the law. Donald says he understands the law about money  and benefits where  he does not need approval from Congress for this one so we make it work since it looks like someone or "they was_ trying to kill us off, starve us out as North Americans from within. Donald is here now and he sees Coca Cola is anathema to tariffs. Donald agrees. We cannot continue to see our economy hemorrhagic-ally lose people over the benefits. 

A Photograph of the Canadian Parliament and Cabinet. It's a nice photo. (.     ) 

This is a photo of the local McDonald's Restaurant team and Management in your area. Look at them hustle. It's a nice photo. (.     ). 

This is a photo of the Operations team that will get Canada going pursuant to the laws. (.     ).

 Yet, we are not fighting Iran but ourselves when the benefits are not paid to our people and then the Iranians come to live in Canada or the UK as refugees that thrive over us with their Iranian benefits that covers them and enables them to help themselves and their people regardless of how the English bank may hold their UK benefits and never credit their UK bank  account. The pay the  rent for the fish and chips shop  and then they buy the building, buy the whole block.  So, the English guy who is probably a White African, innit?, after all the wars has an Iranian landlord. You see in some parts of the UK, there are four kebab shops and one fish and chips shop on the main high road; on average. This is because the population determines the market for food, the demand for food.  But, we can do something right since now we see the issue and it won't matter tomorrow since the kebab is here to stay. We will have enough to buy more and these people are making many babies, some white and some black, who will have the taste for kebabs and who will.pray and wash their hands after football with their Nikes or Diadoras on; innit? So we pay the benefits. 

You are being occupied, over run like the beach in Skegness, full of hot sand and cool happy, fresh water.  The UK people  are disappearing because of it. As such, the Iranian and other foreigners with their more certain national benefits fill  the vacancy in population that the  fraudulent Canadian employees have created in not paying the benefits to Canadians. Since there is a Court order on the issue, it's contempt of Court.  It must be paid equally to all citizens. But, you started this game in 1980 on the day of the wedding of the current Rex with Diana in the UK and Canada to only ask what he will do, as if to park a social and economic time bomb at his  front door. But you cause the problem in your alleged job with  access to government matters and then you criticise him. You suggest you would take the country and break away to leave in some declaration of independence but you can't leave when you are not a state; nor are you an independent country and how do you say you would leave when you are guilty for the benefit  mess? This is written by you as a  Canadian who has finally confessed. You are a hero.  You will send the benefits tomorrow.  

 McDonalds has been more determined to use the best of everything to provide services and product.  The government, however is the only legal entity that takes more than 14% of everything. But, its not working as we would expect. We see the golden rule in school as financed by the government but we do not see it in the national or provincial benefits.  There is an unusual kingdom within a kingdom phenomena  as to active works that defy policy. "Ontario Works" is that phenomena or activity in defiance of S.15 of the Charter so its unconstitutional and you would not use a notwithstanding clause for this in "spite" so people have to suffer unequal treatment in Kingston or Orangeville or Halton where the benefits are not paid.  We should not try to rationalize it.  The purpose of the benefit is not to foster desperate congestion. It is to keep people moving and ensure there is no hungry crowding around Toronto with people hiding in subway tunnels and then trying to take a house when people are on vacation.  IF they have money, they can keep moving.  Nonetheless, we see that if overcrowding was your concern, you would never have built soo many buildings in the GTA.  You intend to see people and lots people.  Your attitudes toward this benefit have been unsupported by any rationale. We need for our lives. We need it paid equally. That is the law. That is the culture. Anything else is appalling and unjustifiable; shoo!   See that there are already rulings on this issue.

See: 

Fraser v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 SCC 28, confirmed that facially neutral pension policies causing adverse impacts based on gender (e.g., denying pension buy-backs for job-sharing RCMP officers) violate Section 15(1) Charter equality rights. It established that "choice" does not negate discrimination when policies perpetuate historical, systemic disadvantages.

Similar Judgements and Key Equality Cases:

• Quebec (Attorney General) v. Alliance du personnel professionnel et technique de la santé et des services sociaux, 2018 SCC 17: A landmark pay equity case and one of the few successful s. 15(1) claims based on sex prior to Fraser, focusing on gender-based wage discrimination.
• Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61: Established that providing services to the public must ensure equal access to benefits, often cited in conjunction with adverse impact discrimination cases.
• Withler v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 12: Addressed the"appropriate comparator" analysis for section 15 claims, emphasizing a substantive, not formalistic, approach to benefit equality.
• British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU, 1999 SCC 32 (Meiorin): While an employment law case, it set the standard for testing if discriminatory standards (like physical fitness tests) are bona fide occupational requirements, heavily influencing the "adverse impact" analysis in Fraser.
• Canadian National Railway Co. v. Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission), 1987 SCC 79 (Action Travail des Femmes): A foundational case establishing that systemic discrimination must be remedied, even if not intentionally designed to exclude, closely aligning with the principles in Fraser. 

These cases collectively emphasize that true equality requires looking beyond neutral rules to the actual, disproportionate effects they have on disadvantaged groups.  

Why would you do that; dammit Patricio Brown? I think we should give him an award  and degree from Northwestern University or from  Carlton University; the best in politics.   If the charter says benefits must be essentially equal with some differences we agree to for disabilities, then how do I ask you to sign up for a program that confirms you have no money because you did not get the benefits others received and then pay you less ($10,000.00 per year) than those who actually receive the benefit at $30000.00 per year.  The kid who applied for Ontario Works suffered a fraud by his father who wanted to receive all the benefits in the family. The system has to be prepared for these fraudsters and their way or rule cannot over rule the love and order of the king. You are getting $30000.00 per year without interruption living next door. As to equality across the country, this number is too low and should approximate $90,000.00 per year; give or take a few thousand so it might be $87000.00 or $92000.00 per year.    $90000.00 per year  is fine paid to your bank account at $7500.00 per year.   If its not working like this, who decides that it is not working?   If it comes to benefits, we could design  a system that provides a presto benefit card that will pay the monthly cash benefits to the card immediately for debit payments until you may opt online in the presto benefit system to have the benefits paid to your bank account.  The system would also pay all equally.  If you have arrears, you can make claim for those arrears on the presto benefit system and opt for the number of years to see the pay down of those arrears from 1 year up to 30 years. This is not difficult once we see how much we pay civil servants; sometimes $2,000,000.00 per year.  So arrears of $ 1,200,000.00 etc is not an issue if its just the benefit we are receiving together so we can go on a ski trip as grade 8 alumni friends in our 40's etc.  Bring your family.     You can opt to see your benefits in the presto system pay the benefit daily, weekly, every two weeks or monthly.  In those emergencies where you have lost your bank or presto  benefit card, you could use your health card for payment at the store. If you offered some kid to be the  Boss of... and  hope to steal his benefits to see him dead for your ego and for your sins, how does that work when its your sin and adding one more can't really help to clear it?  There is no deal. But if you can build such intelligent new subways that are designed to save people, keep people safe, then you can design benefit systems that keep people safe.  The Kingdom is maintained sometimes by violence and when interrupted by hatred and the evil, The Kingdom removes the interruptions; to take it back by force.  

Click here.   

The whole Canadian experience is kind of a fraud.  We sing and cheer for the sports teams. We spend money for flags and sheets. They dress up for the games and fix the hair really nice and smile for the cameras. All of this happens and then  many Canadians are not receiving their benefits.  If the MP knew that there is just one Canadian that is  not receiving their benefit, we believe he would resolve it the next day so that all the Canadians received their benefits equally or what else is he doing and why?

We thank them for their assistance. 

 It’s incredibly frustrating to feel like there is a "performance" of national pride while the basic systems that are supposed to support citizens aren't functioning. When you see the pomp and circumstance of sports or public events, it can feel like a slap in the face if you're struggling to navigate a bureaucracy that feels indifferent to your actual needs.

How would you feel about a politician named Sayed, Johnson or Geronimo that does not help your friends get their benefits?  They have known for months after recieving assistance requests from him and also after recieving information from the local benefits office. You see the benefit all others are recieving is not a matter of means testing qualifications above the basic evidence of citizenship. You get it when you are a citizen. On the day of provision in 1985, he was living in the right town in Ontario. 

Your frustration with your Member of Parliament (MP) is shared by many. The expectation is that they are your direct line to the government—the person who fixes the "glitch in the machine."

Why isn't the MP fixing it "the next day"?

While it should be that simple, here is a bit of insight into why these delays happen and what your MP is actually doing:

 * Jurisdictional Separation: Often, the benefits people are missing are provincial (like ODSP or OHIP) while your MP handles federal issues (like EI, CPP, or CRA). If you contact an MP about a provincial issue, they technically have no power over it, and vice versa for an MPP.

 * The "Case File" Process: When you bring a problem to an MP, their staff opens a Constituency Case. They have "hotlines" to government agencies, but they are still subject to the same backlogs as everyone else. They can't usually override the law; they can only force a human to actually look at your file.

 * Policy vs. Individual Fixes: MPs spend their time in Ottawa debating laws (the "big picture"). Unfortunately, this often takes them away from the "small picture"—the individual Canadian who hasn't received a cheque.

How to hold them accountable

If you or someone you know is being denied benefits, the "smiling for the camera" doesn't help. Here is how you can move past the fluff:

 * The "In-Person" Squeaky Wheel: Emails are easy to ignore. Calling the constituency office and requesting an in-person meeting with the Caseworker (not just the MP) is often more effective.

 * The Taxpayer Ombudsman: If the CRA is the issue, there is a specific office (the Office of the Taxpayers’ Ombudsman) designed to handle these failures when the MP route isn't working.

 * Media and Public Record: Sometimes, reminding an MP that "one Canadian not receiving benefits" is a news story helps speed up their "next day" timeline.

It’s valid to feel like the "Canadian experience" is out of sync with reality when the safety net has holes in it.

This is not the service we are paying for though as we are believing in the politicians to give life to our expectations of law and compliance with that law. 

We thank them for their assistance. 

They are amazing if we can actually see and receive the benefit. 

SDGCK; We are here to help you!

  

Bo knows...Geronimo knows....

  You are correct that the U.S. government is sued frequently and loses (or settles) regularly in tort cases. However, this happens because the government **waived** its immunity for specific situations through the **Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) of 1946**. Before 1946, you generally could not sue the U.S. government for a tort at all.

If your legal strategy is based on the idea that immunity does not exist or is currently being pierced by these lawsuits, here is the functional breakdown of how those "wins" actually happen in court.

### 1. The "Win" Mechanism: The FTCA

When litigants win against the U.S. government, they are usually succeeding under the FTCA (28\ U.S.C.\ \S\ 1346(b)). This law acts as a "limited waiver." It says the U.S. will accept liability **only if** a private person would be liable under the same circumstances according to the law of the place where the act occurred.

To be the "appropriate litigant" and win, you must navigate these specific FTCA rules:

 * **The Administrative Claim:** You cannot go straight to court. You must first file a **Standard Form 95 (SF-95)** with the specific federal agency involved. If they deny it or don't respond within six months, only then can you file a lawsuit.

 * **The Named Defendant:** Even if an official made the statement, the **only** proper defendant in an FTCA suit is **"The United States of America."** If you name a specific department or individual, the court will often dismiss the case or automatically substitute the U.S. as the defendant.

### 2. Identifying the Litigant for "Offensive Statements"

If the goal is to sue for statements regarding the "death of a civilization" that offended people of Iranian descent, the legal path usually targets these specific categories of tort:

 * **Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED):** This is the most common "tort of offense." To win, a litigant must prove the conduct was "outrageous and intolerable" and caused severe emotional trauma.

 * **Constitutional Torts (Bivens Claims):** If you argue the statement violated the **Fifth Amendment** (Equal Protection) by targeting a specific ethnic group, you might sue the specific officials who spoke.

### 3. The Litigant Hierarchy in Federal Court

To file 100 suits per person, you would need to organize the plaintiffs (the people of Iranian descent) as follows:

| Role | Entity to be Named |

|---|---|

| **Plaintiff** | The individual citizen/resident of Iranian descent. |

| **Defendant** | **The United States of America** (under FTCA) OR **The Specific Official** (under *Bivens*). |

| **Jurisdiction** | U.S. District Court (Federal). |

### 4. The "Discretionary Function" Obstacle

The reason the government wins many of these cases is a specific clause in the law called the **Discretionary Function Exception**. It states that the government cannot be sued for any act based upon the exercise of a "discretionary function," even if that discretion is abused.

Courts often rule that **public speech and policy statements** by high-ranking officials are discretionary acts of governance. To win, a litigant must prove that the official had a "non-discretionary duty" (a mandatory law they had to follow) that they broke by making the statement.

### Strategy for Bulk Filings

If you intend to file a massive volume of suits, the court will likely consolidate them into a single **Multi-District Litigation (MDL)** or a **Class Action**. This prevents the court system from being overwhelmed by thousands of individual trials for the same statement.

Are you looking for the specific addresses where the **Service of Process** (the legal notice) must be delivered for the U.S. Government?

To pursue a lawsuit against the United States government or the President for specific statements, the structure of your legal filing is critical. In the U.S. court system, you do not simply name the "White House," as it is a physical location and administrative office, not a legal entity that can be sued in its own name.

Here is the breakdown of who the appropriate litigants are for such a case:

### 1. The Correct Defendant (The Entity Sued)

 * **The United States of America:** If you are suing for a "Tort" (a civil wrong like emotional distress or harm caused by government speech), the **Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)** requires you to name the "United States of America" as the sole defendant.

 * **The President in their Official Capacity:** If the goal is to challenge the legality of the statement itself (seeking an injunction or a ruling that the statement was unconstitutional), you name the individual currently holding the office, e.g., *" [Name of President], in his official capacity as President of the United States."*

 * **The Attorney General:** As the "official representative" of the U.S. government in all legal matters, the Attorney General (Department of Justice) is often named in suits challenging federal policy or conduct.

### 2. The Practical Litigant Structure

If you were to file these suits, the "caption" of your lawsuit would look like this:

> **PLAINTIFFS:** [Name of Individual] and all others similarly situated of Iranian descent.

> **vs.**

> **DEFENDANTS:** The United States of America; and [Name of President], in his official capacity.

> 

### 3. Critical Immunity Realities

While you mentioned there is "no legal immunity," the Supreme Court has established two very high hurdles for cases involving Presidential speech:

 * **Absolute Civil Immunity:** In *Nixon v. Fitzgerald*, the Supreme Court ruled that the President has **absolute immunity** from civil damages for any acts within the "outer perimeter" of their official duties. This includes making public statements and foreign policy declarations.

 * **The "Official Act" Distinction:** Under the recent ruling in *Trump v. United States* (2024), statements made by the President to the public about matters of national concern are considered "official acts." This makes it nearly impossible to sue the President personally for money; instead, the suit must be against the **United States Government** as an institution.

### 4. Strategy for the "100 Suits" Approach

To manage a massive volume of litigants (all people of Iranian descent), a single individual or a group would typically file a **Class Action Lawsuit**.

 * **The Process:** You file one case on behalf of a "Class." If the judge certifies the class, a single win would apply to every person of Iranian descent in the country.

 * **The Goal:** You would be suing for **Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)** or a violation of **Equal Protection** under the 5th Amendment, arguing the statement targeted a specific ethnicity.

### Summary Table: Who to Serve

| If you want... | Name this Defendant | Who receives the papers? |

|---|---|---|

| **Money/Damages** | The United States of America | The U.S. Attorney for your District |

| **A Judicial Order** | The President (Official Capacity) | The Attorney General of the U.S. |

| **A Policy Change** | The Dept. of Justice | The Attorney General of the U.S. |

If you are proceeding with this, the first mandatory step is filing an **Administrative Claim** with the agency involved (or the Department of Justice) using **Standard Form 95**. You cannot step into a courtroom until that claim is filed and denied.

When suing the United States government for **Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)** or **Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (NIED)**, the legal framework is exceptionally rigid. Because you are pursuing a **Tort**, the case is governed by the **Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)**.

To successfully litigate this, you must satisfy the following procedural and substantive requirements:

### 1. The Mandatory First Step: The Administrative Claim

You cannot file a lawsuit in federal court until you have exhausted your administrative remedies.

 * **The Filing:** You must file a **Standard Form 95** with the Department of Justice or the specific agency responsible for the statements.

 * **The Waiting Period:** The government has **6 months** to respond. If they deny the claim or fail to respond, you then have the legal right to file a complaint in U.S. District Court.

 * **The Sum:** You must state a "sum certain" (a specific dollar amount) for the damages. In your case, this would be the calculated amount for every person of Iranian descent included in the suit.

### 2. Identifying the Litigants in the Complaint

In the formal court filing (the Complaint), the parties must be named as follows:

 * **The Plaintiffs:** The individual(s) suffering the distress. If filing for a large group, you would name a representative plaintiff (e.g., *"Joseph Anglia, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated"*).

 * **The Defendant:** **The United States of America.** Under the FTCA, you cannot name the President or an agency as a defendant for a tort; the law automatically substitutes the United States as the party responsible for the actions of its employees.

### 3. Proving Emotional Distress against the Sovereign

To win an IIED claim against the government, the burden of proof is high. You must demonstrate:

 * **Outrageous Conduct:** The statement "a whole civilization will die tonight" must be deemed "so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency."

 * **Intent or Recklessness:** The speaker intended to cause emotional distress or acted with deliberate disregard for the high probability that distress would occur.

 * **Causation and Severity:** The plaintiffs must prove they suffered "severe" emotional distress. In many states, this requires medical documentation or proof of physical manifestation of the stress.

### 4. The "Private Person" Standard

The FTCA states that the U.S. is liable only if a **private person** would be liable under the same circumstances. Your legal team would need to argue that if a private CEO made a public statement threatening the destruction of a civilization, they would be liable for the emotional trauma caused to the members of that civilization.

### Comparison of Litigant Roles

| Litigant Category | Entity | Legal Function |

|---|---|---|

| **Lead Plaintiff** | Representative of the Iranian-American community | Provides the "standing" to sue. |

| **Principal Defendant** | The United States of America | Holds the "deep pockets" for damage awards. |

| **Official Representative** | The U.S. Attorney General | Defends the government's actions in court. |

| **Subject of Inquiry** | The President / Spokesperson | The individual whose statements caused the alleged tort. |

### Risks to Consider

 * **The Discretionary Function Exception:** The government will likely argue that high-level statements about international conflict are "discretionary acts" of foreign policy, which are immune from tort suits under 28\ U.S.C.\ \S\ 2680(a).

 * **Free Speech Defense:** The government may argue that the statements are protected political speech, complicating a tort claim for emotional distress.

Bishop Mclendon....

 

Congratulations to the Artemis Crew and the safe return home.